Literature DB >> 20713724

Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings.

Shahzeen Z Attari1, Michael L DeKay, Cliff I Davidson, Wändi Bruine de Bruin.   

Abstract

In a national online survey, 505 participants reported their perceptions of energy consumption and savings for a variety of household, transportation, and recycling activities. When asked for the most effective strategy they could implement to conserve energy, most participants mentioned curtailment (e.g., turning off lights, driving less) rather than efficiency improvements (e.g., installing more efficient light bulbs and appliances), in contrast to experts' recommendations. For a sample of 15 activities, participants underestimated energy use and savings by a factor of 2.8 on average, with small overestimates for low-energy activities and large underestimates for high-energy activities. Additional estimation and ranking tasks also yielded relatively flat functions for perceived energy use and savings. Across several tasks, participants with higher numeracy scores and stronger proenvironmental attitudes had more accurate perceptions. The serious deficiencies highlighted by these results suggest that well-designed efforts to improve the public's understanding of energy use and savings could pay large dividends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20713724      PMCID: PMC2941272          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1001509107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies.

Authors:  S Pacala; R Socolow
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Design principles for carbon emissions reduction programs.

Authors:  Paul C Stern; Gerald T Gardner; Michael P Vandenbergh; Thomas Dietz; Jonathan M Gilligan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous?

Authors:  Anthony A Leiserowitz
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Numeracy and decision making.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic; C K Mertz; Ketti Mazzocco; Stephan Dickert
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-05

5.  Global temperature change.

Authors:  James Hansen; Makiko Sato; Reto Ruedy; Ken Lo; David W Lea; Martin Medina-Elizade
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Nonpersuasive communication about matters of greatest urgency: climate change.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Economics. The MPG illusion.

Authors:  Richard P Larrick; Jack B Soll
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Energy. Behavior and energy policy.

Authors:  Hunt Allcott; Sendhil Mullainathan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Why it won't happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  26 in total

1.  Narrowing the US energy efficiency gap.

Authors:  Thomas Dietz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Politics shapes individual choices about energy efficiency.

Authors:  Thomas Dietz; Christina Leshko; Aaron M McCright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Hawthorne effect and energy awareness.

Authors:  Daniel Schwartz; Baruch Fischhoff; Tamar Krishnamurti; Fallaw Sowell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Assessing what to address in science communication.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ann Bostrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Characterizing perceptions of energy consumption.

Authors:  Shane W Frederick; Andrew B Meyer; Daniel Mochon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Nonprice incentives and energy conservation.

Authors:  Omar I Asensio; Magali A Delmas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Informing Public Perceptions About Climate Change: A 'Mental Models' Approach.

Authors:  Gabrielle Wong-Parodi; Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices.

Authors:  Dena M Gromet; Howard Kunreuther; Richard P Larrick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Perceptions of water use.

Authors:  Shahzeen Z Attari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Understanding environmentally significant consumption.

Authors:  Thomas Dietz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.