Literature DB >> 23630266

Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices.

Dena M Gromet1, Howard Kunreuther, Richard P Larrick.   

Abstract

This research demonstrates how promoting the environment can negatively affect adoption of energy efficiency in the United States because of the political polarization surrounding environmental issues. Study 1 demonstrated that more politically conservative individuals were less in favor of investment in energy-efficient technology than were those who were more politically liberal. This finding was driven primarily by the lessened psychological value that more conservative individuals placed on reducing carbon emissions. Study 2 showed that this difference has consequences: In a real-choice context, more conservative individuals were less likely to purchase a more expensive energy-efficient light bulb when it was labeled with an environmental message than when it was unlabeled. These results highlight the importance of taking into account psychological value-based considerations in the individual adoption of energy-efficient technology in the United States and beyond.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23630266      PMCID: PMC3677426          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218453110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

1.  Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes.

Authors:  Leaf Van Boven; Charles M Judd; David K Sherman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-04-30

2.  A dirty word or a dirty world?: Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory.

Authors:  David J Hardisty; Eric J Johnson; Elke U Weber
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-12-10

Review 3.  A house divided? The psychology of red and blue America.

Authors:  D Conor Seyle; Matthew L Newman
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2006-09

Review 4.  Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities.

Authors:  John T Jost; Christopher M Federico; Jaime L Napier
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

6.  Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations.

Authors:  Andrew F Hayes; Jörg Matthes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-08

7.  Economics. The MPG illusion.

Authors:  Richard P Larrick; Jack B Soll
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Energy. Behavior and energy policy.

Authors:  Hunt Allcott; Sendhil Mullainathan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The moral roots of environmental attitudes.

Authors:  Matthew Feinberg; Robb Willer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-12-10

10.  Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes.

Authors:  Jonah Berger; Chip Heath
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-09
View more
  19 in total

1.  Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change.

Authors:  Justin Farrell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Politics shapes individual choices about energy efficiency.

Authors:  Thomas Dietz; Christina Leshko; Aaron M McCright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Altruism, self-interest, and energy consumption.

Authors:  Thomas Dietz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Conflict across representational gaps: Threats to and opportunities for improved communication.

Authors:  Matthew A Cronin; Laurie R Weingart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance.

Authors:  Daniel A DeCaro; Craig Anthony Tony Arnol; Emmanuel Frimpong Boama; Ahjond S Garmestani
Journal:  Ecol Soc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.403

6.  Understanding environmentally significant consumption.

Authors:  Thomas Dietz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives.

Authors:  Matthew Baldwin; Joris Lammers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics.

Authors:  Caitlin Drummond; Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Multidimensional Model of Environmental Attitudes: Evidence Supporting an Abbreviated Measure in Spanish.

Authors:  Elena Andrade; Gloria Seoane; Luis Velay; Jose-Manuel Sabucedo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Values determine the (in)effectiveness of informational interventions in promoting pro-environmental behavior.

Authors:  Jan Willem Bolderdijk; Madelijne Gorsira; Kees Keizer; Linda Steg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.