Literature DB >> 16506973

American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous?

Anthony A Leiserowitz1.   

Abstract

Public risk perceptions can fundamentally compel or constrain political, economic, and social action to address particular risks. Public support or opposition to climate policies (e.g., treaties, regulations, taxes, subsidies) will be greatly influenced by public perceptions of the risks and dangers posed by global climate change. This article describes results from a national study (2003) that examined the risk perceptions and connotative meanings of global warming in the American mind and found that Americans perceived climate change as a moderate risk that will predominantly impact geographically and temporally distant people and places. This research also identified several distinct interpretive communities, including naysayers and alarmists, with widely divergent perceptions of climate change risks. Thus, "dangerous" climate change is a concept contested not only among scientists and policymakers, but among the American public as well.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16506973     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  46 in total

1.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings.

Authors:  Shahzeen Z Attari; Michael L DeKay; Cliff I Davidson; Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople.

Authors:  Travis William Reynolds; Ann Bostrom; Daniel Read; M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 3.  Communicating about ocean health: theoretical and practical considerations.

Authors:  Jonathon P Schuldt; Katherine A McComas; Sahara E Byrne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States.

Authors:  Dietram A Scheufele; Elizabeth A Corley; Tsung-jen Shih; Kajsa E Dalrymple; Shirley S Ho
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology.

Authors:  Dan M Kahan; Donald Braman; Paul Slovic; John Gastil; Geoffrey Cohen
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 39.213

6.  Assessing what to address in science communication.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ann Bostrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rising temperatures and dwindling water supplies? Perception of climate change among residents of the Spanish Mediterranean tourist coastal areas.

Authors:  Hug March; David Saurí; Jorge Olcina
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Nanotechnology and society: the evolution of risk perceptions.

Authors:  Dan M Kahan
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 39.213

9.  Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions.

Authors:  Edward W Maibach; Matthew Nisbet; Paula Baldwin; Karen Akerlof; Guoqing Diao
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Applied climate-change analysis: the climate wizard tool.

Authors:  Evan H Girvetz; Chris Zganjar; George T Raber; Edwin P Maurer; Peter Kareiva; Joshua J Lawler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.