Literature DB >> 20708331

Randomized controlled trial of barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy anastomosis: technique and outcomes.

Stephen B Williams1, Mehrdad Alemozaffar, Yin Lei, Nathanael Hevelone, Stuart R Lipsitz, Blakely A Plaster, Jim C Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) urethrovesical anastomosis is a critical step. Although the prevalence of urine leaks ranges from 4.5% to 7.5% at high-volume RALP centers, urine leaks prolong catheterization and may lead to ileus, peritonitis, and require intervention. Barbed polyglyconate sutures maintain running suture line tension and may be advantageous in RALP anastomosis for reducing this complication.
OBJECTIVE: To compare barbed polyglyconate and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA) running sutures for RALP anastomosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-surgeon study comparing RALP anastomosis using either barbed polyglyconate (n = 45) or polyglactin 910 (n = 36) sutures. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: RALP anastomosis using either barbed polyglyconate or polyglactin 910 sutures was studied. MEASUREMENTS: Operative time, cost differential, perioperative complications, and cystogram contrast extravasation by anastomosis suture type were measured. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Although baseline characteristics and overall operative times were similar, barbed polyglyconate sutures were associated with shorter mean anastomosis times of 9.7 min versus 9.8 min (p = 0.014). In addition, anastomosis with barbed polyglyconate rather than polyglactin 910 sutures was associated with more frequent cystogram extravasation 8 d postoperatively (20.0% vs 2.8%; p = 0.019), longer mean catheterization times (11.1 d vs 8.3 d; p = 0.048), and greater suture costs per case ($51.52 vs $8.44; p < 0.001). After 8 of 29 (27.6%) barbed polyglyconate anastomosis sites demonstrated postoperative day 8 cystogram extravasation, we modified our technique to avoid overtightening, reducing cystogram extravasation to 1 (6.3%) of 16 subsequent barbed polyglyconate anastomosis sites. Potential limitations include small sample size and the single-surgeon study design.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to traditional sutures, barbed polyglyconate is more costly and requires technical modification to avoid overtightening, delayed healing, and longer catheterization time following RALP.
Copyright © 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20708331     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  32 in total

Review 1.  Prospective evaluation of unidirectional barbed suture for various indications in surgeon-controlled robotic reconstructive urologic surgery: Wake Forest University experience.

Authors:  Hemendra N Shah; Rishi Nayyar; Shrinivas Rajamahanty; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Variations in the quality of care at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jesse Sammon; Jay Jhaveri; Maxine Sun; Khurshid R Ghani; Jan Schmitges; Wooju Jeong; James O Peabody; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Mani Menon
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence.

Authors:  Harveer S Dev; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Abhishek Srivastava; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Comprehensive approach for post-prostatectomy incontinence in the era of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Haga; Ruriko Takinami; Ryo Tanji; Akifumi Onagi; Kanako Matsuoka; Tomoyuki Koguchi; Hidenori Akaihata; Junya Hata; Soichiro Ogawa; Masao Kataoka; Yuichi Sato; Kei Ishibashi; Ken Aikawa; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-26

5.  Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparative trial.

Authors:  Vito De Blasi; Olivier Facy; Martine Goergen; Virginie Poulain; Luigi De Magistris; Juan Santiago Azagra
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Unfavorable outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty using barbed sutures: a multi-center experience.

Authors:  Evangelos Liatsikos; Thomas Knoll; Iason Kyriazis; Ioannis Georgiopoulos; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Patrick Honeck; Jens Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 201 patients.

Authors:  Olivier Facy; Vito De Blasi; Martine Goergen; Luca Arru; Luigi De Magistris; Juan-Santiago Azagra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Novel method of knotless vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: feasibility study and early outcomes in 30 patients using the interlocked barbed unidirectional V-LOC180 suture.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn; Hugues Widmer; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Dan Liberman; Naeem Bhojani; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ronald Denis; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Continuous suture of a single absorbable suture: a new simplified vesicourethral anastomosis technique in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Peng-fei Shao; Qiang Lv; Ning-hong Song; Jie Li; Wei Zhang; Pu Li; Li-xin Hua; Chang-jun Yin
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

Review 10.  Use of Barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery. Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Manuel Ferrer-Márquez; Ricardo Belda-Lozano; Alberto Soriano-Maldonado
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.