PURPOSE: Barbed self-retaining sutures (SRS) have been introduced as an advance in suture technology, facilitating reconstructive laparoscopic surgery. We present the experience of three centers performing laparoscopic pyeloplasty with the use of SRS. METHODS: Preoperative, intraoperative and follow-up data were collected for 6 patients undergoing pyeloplasty using the Quill SRS (Angiotech, Vancouver, CAN) in three centers. Standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty technique was used and a knot-less continuous anastomosis between the spatulated ureter and the renal pelvis was created. RESULTS: Knot-less uretero-pelvic anastomosis creation was feasible in all six cases. Peri-operative data were similar to standard pyeloplasty using conventional suture materials. A very high stricture recurrence rate (5/6 patients) was noted during follow-up. Further endourologic and open interventions were needed to address the recurrence of the strictures. CONCLUSIONS: Knotless intracorporeal laparoscopic suturing using SRS for the reconstruction of UPJ during laparoscopic pyeloplasty is associated with high rates of stricture recurrence at least in the initial cases of each surgeon. Until further investigations elucidate the cause of treatment failure, SRS should not be recommended for upper urinary tract reconstruction.
PURPOSE: Barbed self-retaining sutures (SRS) have been introduced as an advance in suture technology, facilitating reconstructive laparoscopic surgery. We present the experience of three centers performing laparoscopic pyeloplasty with the use of SRS. METHODS: Preoperative, intraoperative and follow-up data were collected for 6 patients undergoing pyeloplasty using the Quill SRS (Angiotech, Vancouver, CAN) in three centers. Standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty technique was used and a knot-less continuous anastomosis between the spatulated ureter and the renal pelvis was created. RESULTS:Knot-less uretero-pelvic anastomosis creation was feasible in all six cases. Peri-operative data were similar to standard pyeloplasty using conventional suture materials. A very high stricture recurrence rate (5/6 patients) was noted during follow-up. Further endourologic and open interventions were needed to address the recurrence of the strictures. CONCLUSIONS: Knotless intracorporeal laparoscopic suturing using SRS for the reconstruction of UPJ during laparoscopic pyeloplasty is associated with high rates of stricture recurrence at least in the initial cases of each surgeon. Until further investigations elucidate the cause of treatment failure, SRS should not be recommended for upper urinary tract reconstruction.
Authors: Thomas R W Herrmann; Evangelos N Liatsikos; Udo Nagele; Olivier Traxer; Axel S Merseburger Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Sergey Shikanov; Mark Wille; Michael Large; David A Lifshitz; Kevin C Zorn; Arieh L Shalhav; Scott E Eggener Journal: J Endourol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Marc Manganiello; Patrick Kenney; David Canes; Andrea Sorcini; Alireza Moinzadeh Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Stephen B Williams; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Yin Lei; Nathanael Hevelone; Stuart R Lipsitz; Blakely A Plaster; Jim C Hu Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Kevin C Zorn; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Jan Schmitges; Hugues Widmer; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Jesse Sammon; Dan Liberman; Maxine Sun; Marco Bianchi; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ronald Denis; Gagan Gautam; Assaad El-Hakim Journal: BJU Int Date: 2012-01-05 Impact factor: 5.588