Literature DB >> 20703953

The quality of colonoscopy services--responsibilities of referring clinicians: a consensus statement of the Quality Assurance Task Group, National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

Robert H Fletcher1, Marion R Nadel, John I Allen, Jason A Dominitz, Douglas O Faigel, David A Johnson, Dorothy S Lane, David Lieberman, John B Pope, Michael B Potter, Deborah P Robin, Paul C Schroy, Robert A Smith.   

Abstract

Primary care clinicians initiate and oversee colorectal screening for their patients, but colonoscopy, a central component of screening programs, is usually performed by consultants. The accuracy and safety of colonoscopy varies among endoscopists, even those with mainstream training and certification. Therefore, it is a primary care responsibility to choose the best available colonoscopy services. A working group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable identified a set of indicators that primary care clinicians can use to assess the quality of colonoscopy services. Quality measures are of actual performance, not training, specialty, or experience alone. The main elements of quality are a complete report, technical competence, and a safe setting for the procedure. We provide explicit criteria that primary care physicians can use when choosing a colonoscopist. Information on quality indicators will be increasingly available with quality improvement efforts within the colonoscopy community and growth in the use of electronic medical records.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20703953      PMCID: PMC2947628          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1446-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  24 in total

1.  Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John H Bond; Sidney Winawer; Theodore R Levin; Randall W Burt; David A Johnson; Lynne M Kirk; Scott Litlin; David A Lieberman; Jerome D Waye; James Church; John B Marshall; Robert H Riddell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ball; Jane Osbourne; Sarah Jowett; Mike Pellen; Mark R Welfare
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-18

3.  Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss; J H Bond; D J Ahnen; H Garewal; G Chejfec
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Successful colorectal cancer screening starts with primary care.

Authors:  Robert H Fletcher
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Disord       Date:  2002

5.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Jaroslaw Regula; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Maria Zwierko; Maciej Rupinski; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.

Authors:  D K Rex; C S Cutler; G T Lemmel; E Y Rahmani; D W Clark; D J Helper; G A Lehman; D G Mark
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Patrick Connor; Daniel McGee; Paul Jowell; Nick Nickl; Steve Schutz; Joseph Leung; John Lee; Eric Libby
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy.

Authors:  Pauline A Mysliwiec; Martin L Brown; Carrie N Klabunde; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; David R Wagner; Ching Y Lin; Gregory N Larkin; James D Rogge; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  13 in total

1.  Socioeconomic and physician supply determinants of racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Samir Soneji; Katrina Armstrong; David A Asch
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Different screening definitions have little impact on polypectomy rate estimates.

Authors:  Mengzhu Jiang; Maida J Sewitch; Lawrence Joseph; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Observational methods to assess the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing right colon cancer mortality risk: SCOLAR.

Authors:  Michael Goodman; Robert H Fletcher; V Paul Doria-Rose; Christopher D Jensen; Alexis M Zebrowski; Tracy A Becerra; Virginia P Quinn; Ann G Zauber; Douglas A Corley; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.

Authors:  Marion R Nadel; Janet Royalty; Jean A Shapiro; Djenaba Joseph; Laura C Seeff; Dorothy S Lane; Diane M Dwyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Fundamental causes of colorectal cancer mortality: the implications of informational diffusion.

Authors:  Andrew Wang; Sean A P Clouston; Marcie S Rubin; Cynthia G Colen; Bruce G Link
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Challenges Implementing Lung Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Richard M Hoffman; Genevieve Birkby; Jan M Eberth; Alison T Brenner; Daniel S Reuland; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.604

7.  Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Alireza Delavari; Faraz Bishehsari; Hamideh Salimzadeh; Pejman Khosravi; Farnaz Delavari; Siavosh Nasseri-Moghaddam; Shahin Merat; Reza Ansari; Homayoon Vahedi; Bijan Shahbazkhani; Mehdi Saberifiroozi; Masoud Sotoudeh; Reza Malekzadeh
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Increased Detection of Colorectal Polyps in Screening Colonoscopy Using High Definition i-SCAN Compared with Standard White Light.

Authors:  Woo Jung Kim; Sang Young Park; Iksoo Park; Wook Jin Lee; Jaechan Park; Nuri Chon; Tak Geun Oh; Kwang Hyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28

9.  Pilot Validation Study: Canadian Global Rating Scale for Colonoscopy Services.

Authors:  Stéphanie Carpentier; Nour Sharara; Alan N Barkun; Sara El Ouali; Myriam Martel; Maida J Sewitch
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-10-20

10.  Developing model-based algorithms to identify screening colonoscopies using administrative health databases.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Mengzhu Jiang; Lawrence Joseph; Robert J Hilsden; Alain Bitton
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.