Literature DB >> 27498205

Applying Data Mining Techniques to Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Joana Diz1, Goreti Marreiros2, Alberto Freitas3,4.   

Abstract

In the field of breast cancer research, and more than ever, new computer aided diagnosis based systems have been developed aiming to reduce diagnostic tests false-positives. Within this work, we present a data mining based approach which might support oncologists in the process of breast cancer classification and diagnosis. The present study aims to compare two breast cancer datasets and find the best methods in predicting benign/malignant lesions, breast density classification, and even for finding identification (mass / microcalcification distinction). To carry out these tasks, two matrices of texture features extraction were implemented using Matlab, and classified using data mining algorithms, on WEKA. Results revealed good percentages of accuracy for each class: 89.3 to 64.7 % - benign/malignant; 75.8 to 78.3 % - dense/fatty tissue; 71.0 to 83.1 % - finding identification. Among the different tests classifiers, Naive Bayes was the best to identify masses texture, and Random Forests was the first or second best classifier for the majority of tested groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer diagnosis; Data mining techniques; Features extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27498205     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0561-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  28 in total

1.  A statistical based feature extraction method for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiresolution representation.

Authors:  Mohamed Meselhy Eltoukhy; Ibrahima Faye; Brahim Belhaouari Samir
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 2.  Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification.

Authors:  S Obenauer; K P Hermann; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Bayesian networks of BI-RADStrade mark descriptors for breast lesion classification.

Authors:  E A Fischer; J Y Lo; M K Markey
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

4.  Discovering mammography-based machine learning classifiers for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Raúl Ramos-Pollán; Miguel Angel Guevara-López; Cesar Suárez-Ortega; Guillermo Díaz-Herrero; Jose Miguel Franco-Valiente; Manuel Rubio-Del-Solar; Naimy González-de-Posada; Mario Augusto Pires Vaz; Joana Loureiro; Isabel Ramos
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Authors:  M T Mandelson; N Oestreicher; P L Porter; D White; C A Finder; S H Taplin; E White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Applying under-sampling techniques and cost-sensitive learning methods on risk assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Lien Hsu; Ping-Cheng Hung; Hung-Yen Lin; Chung-Ho Hsieh
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Laura Ichikawa; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise A Brinton; Ghada N Farhat; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; Catherine Schairer; Stephen H Taplin; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Leveraging Expert Knowledge to Improve Machine-Learned Decision Support Systems.

Authors:  Finn Kuusisto; Inês Dutra; Mai Elezaby; Eneida A Mendonça; Jude Shavlik; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2015-03-25
View more
  7 in total

1.  Fuzzy Expert System based on a Novel Hybrid Stem Cell (HSC) Algorithm for Classification of Micro Array Data.

Authors:  S Arul Antran Vijay; P GaneshKumar
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A Novel Internet of Things Framework Integrated with Real Time Monitoring for Intelligent Healthcare Environment.

Authors:  A Suresh; R Udendhran; M Balamurgan; R Varatharajan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation.

Authors:  Marzieh Esmaeili; Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh; Nasrin Ahmadinejad; Marjan Ghazisaeedi; Azin Nahvijou; Keivan Maghooli
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2020-04-01

4.  Mammography Image-Based Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Using Machine Learning: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Maha M Alshammari; Afnan Almuhanna; Jamal Alhiyafi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Quantum transfer learning for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Vanda Azevedo; Carla Silva; Inês Dutra
Journal:  Quantum Mach Intell       Date:  2022-02-28

6.  Predictive modeling of proliferative vitreoretinopathy using automated machine learning by ophthalmologists without coding experience.

Authors:  Fares Antaki; Ghofril Kahwati; Julia Sebag; Razek Georges Coussa; Anthony Fanous; Renaud Duval; Mikael Sebag
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Application of data mining in the provision of in-home medical care for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Ruihua Yu; Hui Ji; Haosheng Jiang; Wanli Yang; Feng Jiang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.