Literature DB >> 20703583

The use of skin surface electropotentials for breast cancer detection--preliminary clinical trial results obtained using the biofield diagnostic system.

Subbhuraam Vinitha Sree1, E Y K Ng, G Kaw, Rajendra Acharya U, B K Chong.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of the Biofield Diagnostic System (BDS) as an adjunct to established diagnostic techniques such as mammography and ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. The clinical trial was conducted at the Tan Tock Seng hospital, Singapore. 103 women scheduled for mammography and/or ultrasound tests participated in the study. The BDS test recorded a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 97.6%, and an accuracy of 98.1%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.988 which was slightly lower than that of ultrasound (0.994) and slightly higher than that of mammography (0.951). The BDS test has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity values in the studied population. The accuracy is also comparable to that of diagnostic techniques like mammography and ultrasound. Thus, it is evident that BDS can be a fast and reliable adjunct tool for getting a secondary opinion on lesions with indeterminate mammographic and sonographic results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20703583     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-009-9343-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  14 in total

1.  Initial in vivo experience with steady-state subzone-based MR elastography of the human breast.

Authors:  Elijah E W Van Houten; Marvin M Doyley; Francis E Kennedy; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  A framework for early discovery of breast tumor using thermography with artificial neural network.

Authors:  Eddie Yin-Kwee Ng; Sai-Cheong Fok
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 3.  Bioimpedance tomography (electrical impedance tomography).

Authors:  R H Bayford
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Early phases in the development of breast cancer.

Authors:  H S Gallager; J E Martin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Electropotential evaluation as a new technique for diagnosing breast lesions.

Authors:  M Faupel; D Vanel; V Barth; R Davies; I S Fentiman; R Holland; J L Lamarque; V Sacchini; I Schreer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  A review of electrical impedance techniques for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Y Zou; Z Guo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Robert Rosenberg; Carolyn M Rutter; Berta M Geller; Linn A Abraham; Steven H Taplin; Mark Dignan; Gary Cutter; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Transmural electrical potential difference as an early marker in colon cancer.

Authors:  D A Goller; W F Weidema; R J Davies
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-03

9.  Time-domain optical mammography: initial clinical results on detection and characterization of breast tumors.

Authors:  Dirk Grosenick; K Thomas Moesta; Heidrun Wabnitz; Jörg Mucke; Christian Stroszczynski; Rainer Macdonald; Peter M Schlag; Herbert Rinneberg
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 1.980

10.  Prospective evaluation of skin surface electropotentials in Japanese patients with suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  M Fukuda; K Shimizu; N Okamoto; T Arimura; T Ohta; S Yamaguchi; M L Faupel
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1996-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the efficiency of biofield diagnostic system in breast cancer detection using clinical study results and classifiers.

Authors:  Vinitha Sree Subbhuraam; E Y K Ng; G Kaw; Rajendra Acharya U; B K Chong
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Wavelet-based multifractal analysis of dynamic infrared thermograms to assist in early breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Evgeniya Gerasimova; Benjamin Audit; Stephane G Roux; André Khalil; Olga Gileva; Françoise Argoul; Oleg Naimark; Alain Arneodo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.566

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.