Literature DB >> 20703753

Evaluation of the efficiency of biofield diagnostic system in breast cancer detection using clinical study results and classifiers.

Vinitha Sree Subbhuraam1, E Y K Ng, G Kaw, Rajendra Acharya U, B K Chong.   

Abstract

The division of breast cancer cells results in regions of electrical depolarisation within the breast. These regions extend to the skin surface from where diagnostic information can be obtained through measurements of the skin surface electropotentials using sensors. This technique is used by the Biofield Diagnostic System (BDS) to detect the presence of malignancy. This paper evaluates the efficiency of BDS in breast cancer detection and also evaluates the use of classifiers for improving the accuracy of BDS. 182 women scheduled for either mammography or ultrasound or both tests participated in the BDS clinical study conducted at Tan Tock Seng hospital, Singapore. Using the BDS index obtained from the BDS examination and the level of suspicion score obtained from mammography/ultrasound results, the final BDS result was deciphered. BDS demonstrated high values for sensitivity (96.23%), specificity (93.80%), and accuracy (94.51%). Also, we have studied the performance of five supervised learning based classifiers (back propagation network, probabilistic neural network, linear discriminant analysis, support vector machines, and a fuzzy classifier), by feeding selected features from the collected dataset. The clinical study results show that BDS can help physicians to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions, and thereby, aid in making better biopsy recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20703753     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9441-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  8 in total

1.  Early phases in the development of breast cancer.

Authors:  H S Gallager; J E Martin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Association between cell membrane potential and breast cancer.

Authors:  A A Marino; I G Iliev; M A Schwalke; E Gonzalez; K C Marler; C A Flanagan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  1994

3.  Electropotential evaluation as a new technique for diagnosing breast lesions.

Authors:  M Faupel; D Vanel; V Barth; R Davies; I S Fentiman; R Holland; J L Lamarque; V Sacchini; I Schreer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  The use of skin surface electropotentials for breast cancer detection--preliminary clinical trial results obtained using the biofield diagnostic system.

Authors:  Subbhuraam Vinitha Sree; E Y K Ng; G Kaw; Rajendra Acharya U; B K Chong
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Electropotential measurements as a new diagnostic modality for breast cancer.

Authors:  J Cuzick; R Holland; V Barth; R Davies; M Faupel; I Fentiman; H J Frischbier; J L LaMarque; M Merson; V Sacchini; D Vanel; U Veronesi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Transmural electrical potential difference as an early marker in colon cancer.

Authors:  D A Goller; W F Weidema; R J Davies
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-03

Review 7.  The use of tissue electrical characteristics for breast cancer detection: a perspective review.

Authors:  E Y K Ng; S Vinitha Sree; K H Ng; G Kaw
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-08

8.  Prospective evaluation of skin surface electropotentials in Japanese patients with suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  M Fukuda; K Shimizu; N Okamoto; T Arimura; T Ohta; S Yamaguchi; M L Faupel
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1996-10
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Healthy and tumoral tissue resistivity in wild-type and sparc-/- animal models.

Authors:  D Meroni; G Mauri; D Bovio; A M Bianchi; C Chiodoni; M P Colombo; E Meroni; A Aliverti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.602

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.