Literature DB >> 8957069

Prospective evaluation of skin surface electropotentials in Japanese patients with suspicious breast lesions.

M Fukuda1, K Shimizu, N Okamoto, T Arimura, T Ohta, S Yamaguchi, M L Faupel.   

Abstract

The biofield breast examination (BBE) is a new, noninvasive and cost-effective method for diagnosing breast lesions currently undergoing multicenter evaluation in the USA and Europe. The test analyzes subtle differences in electrical potential caused by dysregulated epithelial proliferation. This report summarizes a prospective evaluation of BBE in a population of 101 patients with suspicious breast lesions scheduled either for open surgical biopsy or fine needle aspiration biopsy. Of the 101 patients included in the study, 49 were found to have a breast malignancy and 52 were found to have a benign breast lesion. BBE correctly identified 44 of 49 biopsy-proven cancers (sensitivity=90%) and correctly indicated no cancer in 31 of 52 biopsy-proven benign cases (specificity=60%). Sensitivity increased to 95% for cancers less than 2.5 cm in size. These results indicate that BBE may be an effective adjunctive test to help to resolve abnormalities discovered by physical examination or other screening methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8957069      PMCID: PMC5920994          DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1996.tb03115.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res        ISSN: 0910-5050


  7 in total

1.  The positive predictive value of mammography.

Authors:  D B Kopans
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Changes in membrane potential during the cell cycle.

Authors:  H G Sachs; P J Stambrook; J D Ebert
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Introduction to neural networks.

Authors:  S S Cross; R F Harrison; R L Kennedy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Association between cell membrane potential and breast cancer.

Authors:  A A Marino; I G Iliev; M A Schwalke; E Gonzalez; K C Marler; C A Flanagan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  1994

5.  Transmembrane potential and intracellular potassium ion activity in fetal and maternal liver.

Authors:  L M Chapman; R Wondergem
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.384

6.  Transmural electrical potential difference as an early marker in colon cancer.

Authors:  D A Goller; W F Weidema; R J Davies
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-03

7.  Reasons for failure of physical examination in breast cancer detection (analysis of 232 false-negative cases).

Authors:  G Cardona; L Cataliotti; S Ciatto; M Rosselli Del Turco
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1983-12-31
  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  The use of skin surface electropotentials for breast cancer detection--preliminary clinical trial results obtained using the biofield diagnostic system.

Authors:  Subbhuraam Vinitha Sree; E Y K Ng; G Kaw; Rajendra Acharya U; B K Chong
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Evaluation of the efficiency of biofield diagnostic system in breast cancer detection using clinical study results and classifiers.

Authors:  Vinitha Sree Subbhuraam; E Y K Ng; G Kaw; Rajendra Acharya U; B K Chong
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Statistical and fractal analyses of rat prostate cancer cell motility in a direct current electric field: comparison of strongly and weakly metastatic cells.

Authors:  Zuzanna Siwy; Maria E Mycielska; Mustafa B A Djamgoz
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  A role for PP1/NIPP1 in steering migration of human cancer cells.

Authors:  Cristina Martin-Granados; Alan R Prescott; Nele Van Dessel; Aleyde Van Eynde; Miguel Arocena; Izabela P Klaska; Janina Görnemann; Monique Beullens; Mathieu Bollen; John V Forrester; Colin D McCaig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.