Literature DB >> 18952266

Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes.

Aimee L Wiltz1, Sergey Shikanov, Scott E Eggener, Mark H Katz, Alan E Thong, Gary D Steinberg, Arieh L Shalhav, Gregory P Zagaja, Kevin C Zorn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of body mass index (BMI) on perioperative functional and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) when stratified by BMI.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for 945 consecutive patients undergoing RLRP. Patients were evaluated with the UCLA-PCI-SF36v2 validated-quality-of-life questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively to 24 months. Patients were stratified by BMI as normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI = 25 to < 30 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m(2)) for outcomes analysis.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, obese men had a significantly greater percentage of medical comorbidities (P < .01) as well as a baseline erectile dysfunction (lower mean baseline Sexual Health Inventory for Men score [P = .01] and UCLA-PCI-SF36v2 sexual function domain scores [P = .01]). Mean operative time was significantly longer in obese patients when compared with normal and overweight men (234 minutes vs 217 minutes vs 214 minutes; P = .0003). Although overall complication rates were comparable between groups, a greater incidence of case abortion caused by pneumoperitoneal pressure with excessive airway pressures was noted in obese men. Urinary continence and potency outcomes were significantly lower for obese men at both 12 and 24 months (all P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: In this series, obese men experienced a longer operative time, particularly during the initial robotic experience. As such, surgeons early in their RLRP learning curve should proceed cautiously with surgery in these technically more difficult patients or reserve such cases until the learning curve has been surmounted. These details, including inferior urinary and sexual outcomes, should be discussed with obese patients during preoperative counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18952266     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  32 in total

1.  Robotic surgery techniques for obese patients.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  The Impact of Central Obesity on Storage Luts and Urinary Incontinence After Prostatic Surgery.

Authors:  Mauro Gacci; Arcangelo Sebastianelli; Matteo Salvi; Cosimo De Nunzio; Andrea Tubaro; Stavros Gravas; Ignacio Moncada; Sergio Serni; Mario Maggi; Linda Vignozzi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.

Authors:  Antonio Benito Porcaro; Marco Sebben; Paolo Corsi; Alessandro Tafuri; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Nelia Amigoni; Riccardo Rizzetto; Giovanni Cacciamani; Arianna Mariotto; Alberto Diminutto; Matteo Brunelli; Vincenzo De Marco; Salvatore Siracusano; Walter Artibani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-05

4.  Clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tomohiko Murakami; Satoshi Otsubo; Ryo Namitome; Masaki Shiota; Junichi Inokuchi; Ario Takeuchi; Eiji Kashiwagi; Katsunori Tatsugami; Masatoshi Eto
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-13

5.  Simple vs six-branches autologous suburethral sling during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve early urinary continence recovery: prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Andrea Cestari; Matteo Ferrari; Mattia Sangalli; Matteo Zanoni; Massimo Ghezzi; Fabio Fabbri; Francesco Sozzi; Carolina Lolli; Vincenzo Dell'Acqua; Patrizio Rigatti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-01-11

6.  [Prevention of postprostatectomy incontinence: etiology and risk factors].

Authors:  R Mager; M Kurosch; T Hüsch; M Reiter; I Tsaur; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era.

Authors:  Juan Garisto; Riccardo Bertolo; Clark A Wilson; Jihad Kaouk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [DaVinci robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: benefit for obese men? - A matched-pair analysis].

Authors:  B Beyer; K Kühne; K Böhm; J Schiffmann; H Heinzer; U Michl; H Huland; M Graefen; A Haese; T Steuber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Open Versus Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Obese Men.

Authors:  Chandy Ellimoottil; Florian Roghmann; Robert Blackwell; Adam Kadlec; Kristin Greco; Marcus L Quek; Maxine Sun; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Gopal Gupta
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2015-09-04

Review 10.  Does robotic prostatectomy meet its promise in the management of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Kuo-How Huang; Stacey C Carter; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.