PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on pathologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 400 consecutive patients who underwent RALP at the Mayo Clinic between 2002 and 2006. Patients were categorized as normal weight (BMI <25 kg/ m(2), n = 94), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2), n = 187), and obese (BMI >or=30 kg/m(2), n = 119). Clinicopathologic features of the groups were compared, and logistical regression analysis was used to assess the associations of BMI with pathologic and functional outcomes after RALP. RESULTS: Overweight and obese patients were more likely to have pT(3/4) disease (P = 0.0024) and pathologic Gleason 7 to 10 cancers (P < 0.0001). Overall, 9/94 (9.6%) normal-weight patients had a positive surgical margin (SM), compared with 25/187 (13.4%) overweight patients and 21/119 (17.6%) obese men (P = 0.087). On multivariate analysis, however, increasing BMI was not significantly associated with an increased risk of positive SM (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.76, P = 0.61). In addition, although obese men had longer operative times (P = 0.049) and greater intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.04), we found no association between BMI and transfusion requirement (P = 0.34), length of hospital stay (P = 0.54), or the rates of early (P = 0.37) or late (P = 0.86) complications. Moreover, in those patients with follow-up available at 1 year after RALP, obesity did not impact the return of continence (P = 0.62) or potency (P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: BMI was not an independent predictor of positive SM, complications, incontinence, or erectile dysfunction after RALP. These data suggest that RALP may offer equivalent margin rates and functional outcomes for patients across BMI.
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on pathologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 400 consecutive patients who underwent RALP at the Mayo Clinic between 2002 and 2006. Patients were categorized as normal weight (BMI <25 kg/ m(2), n = 94), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2), n = 187), and obese (BMI >or=30 kg/m(2), n = 119). Clinicopathologic features of the groups were compared, and logistical regression analysis was used to assess the associations of BMI with pathologic and functional outcomes after RALP. RESULTS: Overweight and obesepatients were more likely to have pT(3/4) disease (P = 0.0024) and pathologic Gleason 7 to 10 cancers (P < 0.0001). Overall, 9/94 (9.6%) normal-weight patients had a positive surgical margin (SM), compared with 25/187 (13.4%) overweight patients and 21/119 (17.6%) obesemen (P = 0.087). On multivariate analysis, however, increasing BMI was not significantly associated with an increased risk of positive SM (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.76, P = 0.61). In addition, although obesemen had longer operative times (P = 0.049) and greater intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.04), we found no association between BMI and transfusion requirement (P = 0.34), length of hospital stay (P = 0.54), or the rates of early (P = 0.37) or late (P = 0.86) complications. Moreover, in those patients with follow-up available at 1 year after RALP, obesity did not impact the return of continence (P = 0.62) or potency (P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: BMI was not an independent predictor of positive SM, complications, incontinence, or erectile dysfunction after RALP. These data suggest that RALP may offer equivalent margin rates and functional outcomes for patients across BMI.
Authors: Jonas Busch; Mark L Gonzalgo; Natalia Leva; Michelle Ferrari; Hannes Cash; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Stefan Hinz; Kurt Miller; Ahmed Magheli Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Venu Chalasani; Carlos H Martinez; Darwin Lim; Reem Al Bareeq; Geoffrey R Wignall; Larry Stitt; Stephen E Pautler Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Thiago Camelo Mourão; Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira; Ricardo de Lima Favaretto; Thiago Borges Marques Santana; Carlos Alberto Ricetto Sacomani; Wilson Bachega; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Stênio de Cássio Zequi Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2022 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.541