Literature DB >> 18613784

Impact of obesity on clinicopathologic outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Stephen A Boorjian1, Paul L Crispen, Rachel E Carlson, Laureano J Rangel, R Jeffrey Karnes, Igor Frank, Matthew T Gettman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on pathologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 400 consecutive patients who underwent RALP at the Mayo Clinic between 2002 and 2006. Patients were categorized as normal weight (BMI <25 kg/ m(2), n = 94), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2), n = 187), and obese (BMI >or=30 kg/m(2), n = 119). Clinicopathologic features of the groups were compared, and logistical regression analysis was used to assess the associations of BMI with pathologic and functional outcomes after RALP.
RESULTS: Overweight and obese patients were more likely to have pT(3/4) disease (P = 0.0024) and pathologic Gleason 7 to 10 cancers (P < 0.0001). Overall, 9/94 (9.6%) normal-weight patients had a positive surgical margin (SM), compared with 25/187 (13.4%) overweight patients and 21/119 (17.6%) obese men (P = 0.087). On multivariate analysis, however, increasing BMI was not significantly associated with an increased risk of positive SM (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.76, P = 0.61). In addition, although obese men had longer operative times (P = 0.049) and greater intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.04), we found no association between BMI and transfusion requirement (P = 0.34), length of hospital stay (P = 0.54), or the rates of early (P = 0.37) or late (P = 0.86) complications. Moreover, in those patients with follow-up available at 1 year after RALP, obesity did not impact the return of continence (P = 0.62) or potency (P = 0.13).
CONCLUSION: BMI was not an independent predictor of positive SM, complications, incontinence, or erectile dysfunction after RALP. These data suggest that RALP may offer equivalent margin rates and functional outcomes for patients across BMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18613784     DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

1.  Matched comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy regarding pathologic and oncologic outcomes in obese patients.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Mark L Gonzalgo; Natalia Leva; Michelle Ferrari; Hannes Cash; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Stefan Hinz; Kurt Miller; Ahmed Magheli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy outcomes in obese and extremely obese men.

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Adam C Reese; Lynda Z Mettee; Bruce J Trock; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes during the learning curve for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Venu Chalasani; Carlos H Martinez; Darwin Lim; Reem Al Bareeq; Geoffrey R Wignall; Larry Stitt; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Influence of obesity on localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Qu; Bo Dai; Yun-Yi Kong; Kun Chang; Ding-Wei Ye; Xu-Dong Yao; Shi-Lin Zhang; Hai-Liang Zhang; Wei-Yi Yang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Impact of obesity on early erectile function recovery after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ekong E Uffort; James C Jensen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the morbidly obese patient.

Authors:  Jennifer Yates; Ravi Munver; Ihor Sawczuk
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2010-11-29

7.  Patient-reported quality of life recovery curves after robotic prostatectomy are similar across body mass index categories.

Authors:  Tullika Garg; Amanda J Young; Korey A Kost; Alyssa M Park; John F Danella; H Lester Kirchner
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-08-03

8.  Should obesity be associated with worse urinary continence outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy? a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Thiago Camelo Mourão; Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira; Ricardo de Lima Favaretto; Thiago Borges Marques Santana; Carlos Alberto Ricetto Sacomani; Wilson Bachega; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Stênio de Cássio Zequi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.