Literature DB >> 20692557

Precision of biometry, keratometry, and refractive measurements with a partial coherence interferometry-keratometry device.

H John Shammas1, Steven Chan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the precision of the axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), astigmatism, and minus astigmatic cylinder axis measurements by a partial coherence interferometry (PCI)-keratometry device.
SETTING: Private practice, Lynwood, California.
METHODS: This prospective comparative observational study analyzed measurements in the second eye to have cataract surgery. Before surgery in the first eye, AL, K, ACD, astigmatism, and cylinder axis in both eyes were measured with an IOLMaster PCI device. The measurements were repeated approximately 1 month later, before second eye-surgery. The 2 sets of measurements were compared.
RESULTS: The study evaluated 121 eyes of 121 patients. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for AL was 0.999 in all 3 signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) categories; the highest difference range was with an SNR below 100. Astigmatism, K, and cylinder axis had a high correlation in flat corneas (K reading <42.0 diopters [D]) (ICC = 0.994, 0.978, and 0.918, respectively) and a poorer correlation with K readings between 42.0 D and 44.0 D (ICC = 0.905, 0.774, and 0.456, respectively) and K readings above 44.0 D (ICC = 0.988, 0.729 and 0.446, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The precision of the PCI measurements was extremely high for AL with low fluctuations (95% limits of agreement [LoA], 0.06 mm) and was relatively high for K readings with higher fluctuations (95% LoA, 0.55 D) and for ACD (95% LoA, 0.2 mm). The precision of astigmatism and cylinder axis was high in flat corneas and relatively low in steeper corneas. Copyright (c) 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20692557     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  21 in total

1.  The effect of head tilt on keratometric measurement using the IOLMaster.

Authors:  C Y Park; J R Do; S H Kim; C-Y Lim; R S Chuck
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Precision of 5 different keratometry devices.

Authors:  Jonas Vejvad Nørskov Laursen; Peter Jeppesen; Thomas Olsen
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Validity of autorefractor based screening method for irregular astigmatism compared to the corneal topography- a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Alicia Galindo-Ferreiro; Julita De Miguel-Gutierrez; Manuel González-Sagrado; Alberto Galvez-Ruiz; Rajiv Khandekar; Silvana Schellini; Julio Galindo-Alonso
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  Clinically relevant biometry.

Authors:  Afsun Sahin; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.761

5.  Comparison of acquisition rate and agreement of axial length with two swept-source optical coherence tomographers and a partial coherence interferometer.

Authors:  Shi-Ming Cheng; Wen-Tao Yan; Jia-Sheng Zhang; Tian-Tian Li; Xi Li; A-Yong Yu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Agreement of IOL power and axial length obtained by IOLMaster 500 vs IOLMaster 500 with Sonolink connection.

Authors:  Sabong Srivannaboon; Chareenun Chirapapaisan; Patchara Nantasri; Mathinee Chongchareon; Pratuangsri Chonpimai
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Effects on IOL Power Calculation and Expected Clinical Outcomes of Axial Length Measurements Based on Multiple vs Single Refractive Indices.

Authors:  H John Shammas; Maya C Shammas; Renu V Jivrajka; David L Cooke; Richard Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-04

Review 8.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  The effect of corneal irregularity on astigmatism measurement by automated versus ray tracing keratometry.

Authors:  Hyun Cheol Roh; Roy S Chuck; Jimmy K Lee; Choul Yong Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices.

Authors:  Qinmei Wang; Giacomo Savini; Kenneth J Hoffer; Zhen Xu; Yifan Feng; Daizong Wen; Yanjun Hua; Feng Yang; Chao Pan; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.