BACKGROUND: Nanosecond electric pulses (EP) disrupt cell membrane and organelles and cause cell death in a manner different from the conventional irreversible electroporation. We explored the cytotoxic effect of 10-ns EP (quantitation, mechanisms, efficiency, and specificity) in comparison with 300-ns, 1.8- and 9-μs EP. METHODS: Effects in Jurkat and U937 cells were characterized by survival assays, DNA electrophoresis and flow cytometry. RESULTS: 10-ns EP caused apoptotic or necrotic death within 2-20 h. Survival (S, %) followed the absorbed dose (D, J/g) as: S=alphaD((-K)), where coefficients K and alpha determined the slope and the "shoulder" of the survival curve. K was similar in all groups, whereas alpha was cell type- and pulse duration-dependent. Long pulses caused immediate propidium uptake and phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization, whereas 10-ns pulses caused PS externalization only. CONCLUSIONS: 1.8- and 9-μs EP cause cell death efficiently and indiscriminately (LD₅₀ 1-3 J/g in both cell lines); 10-ns EP are less efficient, but very selective (LD₅₀ 50-80 J/g for Jurkat and 400-500 J/g for U937); 300-ns EP show intermediate effects. Shorter EP open propidium-impermeable, small membrane pores ("nanopores"), triggering different cell death mechanisms. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Nanosecond EP can selectively target certain cells in medical applications like tumor ablation.
BACKGROUND: Nanosecond electric pulses (EP) disrupt cell membrane and organelles and cause cell death in a manner different from the conventional irreversible electroporation. We explored the cytotoxic effect of 10-ns EP (quantitation, mechanisms, efficiency, and specificity) in comparison with 300-ns, 1.8- and 9-μs EP. METHODS: Effects in Jurkat and U937 cells were characterized by survival assays, DNA electrophoresis and flow cytometry. RESULTS: 10-ns EP caused apoptotic or necrotic death within 2-20 h. Survival (S, %) followed the absorbed dose (D, J/g) as: S=alphaD((-K)), where coefficients K and alpha determined the slope and the "shoulder" of the survival curve. K was similar in all groups, whereas alpha was cell type- and pulse duration-dependent. Long pulses caused immediate propidium uptake and phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization, whereas 10-ns pulses caused PS externalization only. CONCLUSIONS: 1.8- and 9-μs EP cause cell death efficiently and indiscriminately (LD₅₀ 1-3 J/g in both cell lines); 10-ns EP are less efficient, but very selective (LD₅₀ 50-80 J/g for Jurkat and 400-500 J/g for U937); 300-ns EP show intermediate effects. Shorter EP open propidium-impermeable, small membrane pores ("nanopores"), triggering different cell death mechanisms. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Nanosecond EP can selectively target certain cells in medical applications like tumor ablation.
Authors: Andrei G Pakhomov; Juergen F Kolb; Jody A White; Ravindra P Joshi; Shu Xiao; Karl H Schoenbach Journal: Bioelectromagnetics Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.010
Authors: Stephen J Beebe; Jody White; Peter F Blackmore; Yuping Deng; Kenneth Somers; Karl H Schoenbach Journal: DNA Cell Biol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.311
Authors: Bennett L Ibey; Shu Xiao; Karl H Schoenbach; Michael R Murphy; Andrei G Pakhomov Journal: Bioelectromagnetics Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.010
Authors: Vincent Idone; Christina Tam; John W Goss; Derek Toomre; Marc Pypaert; Norma W Andrews Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: G Sersa; T Jarm; T Kotnik; A Coer; M Podkrajsek; M Sentjurc; D Miklavcic; M Kadivec; S Kranjc; A Secerov; M Cemazar Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-01-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Andrei G Pakhomov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Iurii Semenov; Marjorie A Kuipers; Bennett L Ibey Journal: Bioelectrochemistry Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 5.373
Authors: Elena C Gianulis; Chantelle Labib; Gintautas Saulis; Vitalij Novickij; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 9.261
Authors: Olga N Pakhomova; Vera A Khorokhorina; Angela M Bowman; Raminta Rodaitė-Riševičienė; Gintautas Saulis; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy Gregory; Karl H Schoenbach; Jody C Ullery; Hope T Beier; Sambasiva R Rajulapati; Bennett L Ibey Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 9.261
Authors: Claudia Muratori; Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; Jade Meads; Maura Casciola; Peter A Mollica; Olga N Pakhomova Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 5.157