Literature DB >> 11218111

Phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users 6 years postoperation.

P J Blamey1, J G Barry, P Jacq.   

Abstract

Increases in the phonetic inventories of a group of 9 children in the fifth and sixth years of experience with a cochlear implant are reported, extending a previous 4-year study (T. A. Serry & P. J. Blamey, 1999). Thirty-six out of 44 phones in Australian English reached the criterion of 50% correct in the conversational samples of 5 or more children. This level of performance corresponds to intelligible, but not completely natural, speech. The rate of improvement in the sixth year was slow, indicating a probable plateau in performance. The 8 phones that did not attain the 50% criterion in 5 or more children were /see text/. Potential reasons for the slow development or nondevelopment of these phones include very low frequency of occurrence for /see text/ and the perceptual and articulatory characteristics of /see text/. /see text/ is also subject to a high degree of allophonic variation in the fluent speech of normally hearing speakers, probably accounting for much of the variability in its articulation in the conversational samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11218111     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/007)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  24 in total

1.  Production of contrast between sibilant fricatives by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech production accuracy and variability in young cochlear implant recipients: comparisons with typically developing age-peers.

Authors:  David J Ertmer; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Acoustic properties of vowel production in prelingually deafened Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Emily Brown; Robert A Fox; Li Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Factors Influencing Elementary and High-School Aged Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Ann E Geers; Madhu Sundarrajan; Janet Lane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Transcribing the speech of children with cochlear implants: clinical application of narrow phonetic transcriptions.

Authors:  Amy P Teoh; Steven B Chin
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Consonant development in pediatric cochlear implant users who were implanted before 30 months of age.

Authors:  Linda J Spencer; Ling-Yu Guo
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2012-11-09

7.  Alveolar and Postalveolar Voiceless Fricative and Affricate Productions of Spanish-English Bilingual Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Fangfang Li; Ferenc Bunta; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Vowel discrimination by hearing infants as a function of number of spectral channels.

Authors:  Andrea D Warner-Czyz; Derek M Houston; Linda S Hynan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Long-term trajectories of the development of speech sound production in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Shu-Chen Peng; Linda J Spencer; Nelson Lu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Initial Stop Voicing in Bilingual Children With Cochlear Implants and Their Typically Developing Peers With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Ferenc Bunta; C Elizabeth Goodin-Mayeda; Amanda Procter; Arturo Hernandez
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.