Literature DB >> 20688567

Embryo aneuploidy and the role of morphological and genetic screening.

Dagan Wells1.   

Abstract

Chromosome abnormalities are common among human oocytes and are usually lethal to any embryos they produce. It therefore seems logical that a reliable technique for distinguishing between normal and aneuploid embryos would be a useful tool for physicians and embryologists, assisting the choice of which embryo(s) to prioritize for uterine transfer. This concept has led to the development of a variety of methods for the detection of chromosome abnormalities in oocytes and embryos, most often referred to as preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). However, several well-controlled studies have been unable to show an advantage of chromosome screening in terms of pregnancy and birth rates. Some investigators have suggested that damage to embryos, sustained during cleavage-stage biopsy, might explain why PGS has not always provided the anticipated benefits. This paper asks whether there is evidence that a non-invasive, morphological analysis could allow chromosomally normal embryos to be accurately identified and reviews data from the most recent publication concerning IVF outcome following PGS.
Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20688567     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  14 in total

1.  Contributing factors for the incidence of aneuploidy in older patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Chromosomal characteristics at cleavage and blastocyst stages from the same embryos.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Nan Zhao; Xiaozhu Wang; Jie Qiao; Ping Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Re-analysis of aneuploidy blastocysts with an inner cell mass and different regional trophectoderm cells.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Liying Yan; Sijia Lu; Nan Zhao; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Could time-lapse embryo imaging reduce the need for biopsy and PGS?

Authors:  Jason E Swain
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Determination of fetal chromosome aberrations from fetal DNA in maternal blood: has the challenge finally been met?

Authors:  Sinuhe Hahn; Olav Lapaire; Sevgi Tercanli; Varaprasad Kolla; Irene Hösli
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.600

7.  No relationship between embryo morphology and successful derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  Susanne Ström; Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg; Frida Holm; Rosita Bergström; Linda Eklund; Anne-Marie Strömberg; Outi Hovatta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Is the hypothesis of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still supportable? A review.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.234

9.  Blastocyst Morphology Holds Clues Concerning The Chromosomal Status of The Embryo.

Authors:  Rita de Cassia Savio Figueira; Amanda Souza Setti; Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-07-27

10.  Definition by FSH, AMH and embryo numbers of good-, intermediate- and poor-prognosis patients suggests previously unknown IVF outcome-determining factor associated with AMH.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Vitaly A Kushnir; Aritro Sen; Sarah K Darmon; Andrea Weghofer; Yan-Guang Wu; Qi Wang; Lin Zhang; David F Albertini; David H Barad
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.