Jason E Swain1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, University of Michigan, 475 Market Place Bldg 1 Ste B, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA, swainj@med.umich.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review relevant studies examining the relationship between embryo morpho-kinetics and aneuploidy. METHODS: Search of Pubmed and Medline using relevant keywords pertaining to morphology, morphokinetics and embryonic aneuploidy, as well as examination of various reference lists and conference proceedings. RESULTS: An abundance of publications, both preliminary and peer-reviewed, have emerged regarding the usefulness of time-lapse imaging in tracking embryo development and improving embryo selection. Recently, these publications have explored ability to not only predict blastocyst formation and implantation, but also the ability to detect embryonic chromosomal aneuploidy. Of the two peer-reviewed retrospective studies on morpho-kinetics and embryonic aneuploidy, one demonstrates that early cleavage timings can indicate chromosomal complement, while the other demonstrates that key events following the maternal-zygotic transition can be markers of aneuploidy. A recent paper also demonstrates improved outcomes following IVF using a selection algorithm to identify embryos at "low risk" of chromosomal abnormalities. However, the predictive nature of these events and timings is far from ideal. Additionally, results may be dependent upon the day of biopsy and method utilized for chromosomal assessment. CONCLUSION: With continued effort, the combination of multiple morphologic endpoint assessments and developmental timings and refinement of modeling systems may improve the predictive ability to determine embryonic aneuploidy. This may help select a subset of embryos that are less likely to carry chromosomal abnormalities and improve assisted reproductive outcomes. However, embryo biopsy, followed by preimplantation genetic screening/comprehensive chromosomal screening still remains the most reliable method to assess chromosomal complement of preimplantation embryos.
PURPOSE: To review relevant studies examining the relationship between embryo morpho-kinetics and aneuploidy. METHODS: Search of Pubmed and Medline using relevant keywords pertaining to morphology, morphokinetics and embryonic aneuploidy, as well as examination of various reference lists and conference proceedings. RESULTS: An abundance of publications, both preliminary and peer-reviewed, have emerged regarding the usefulness of time-lapse imaging in tracking embryo development and improving embryo selection. Recently, these publications have explored ability to not only predict blastocyst formation and implantation, but also the ability to detect embryonic chromosomal aneuploidy. Of the two peer-reviewed retrospective studies on morpho-kinetics and embryonic aneuploidy, one demonstrates that early cleavage timings can indicate chromosomal complement, while the other demonstrates that key events following the maternal-zygotic transition can be markers of aneuploidy. A recent paper also demonstrates improved outcomes following IVF using a selection algorithm to identify embryos at "low risk" of chromosomal abnormalities. However, the predictive nature of these events and timings is far from ideal. Additionally, results may be dependent upon the day of biopsy and method utilized for chromosomal assessment. CONCLUSION: With continued effort, the combination of multiple morphologic endpoint assessments and developmental timings and refinement of modeling systems may improve the predictive ability to determine embryonic aneuploidy. This may help select a subset of embryos that are less likely to carry chromosomal abnormalities and improve assisted reproductive outcomes. However, embryo biopsy, followed by preimplantation genetic screening/comprehensive chromosomal screening still remains the most reliable method to assess chromosomal complement of preimplantation embryos.
Authors: Oleksii O Barash; Kristen A Ivani; Susan P Willman; Evan M Rosenbluth; Deborah S Wachs; Mary D Hinckley; Sara Pittenger Reid; Louis N Weckstein Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Alberto Liñán; Barbara Lawrenz; Ibrahim El Khatib; Asina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Carmen Rubio; Rupali Chopra; Human M Fatemi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 3.240