Literature DB >> 20688191

An analytical approach to characterize morbidity profile dissimilarity between distinct cohorts using electronic medical records.

Jonathan S Schildcrout1, Melissa A Basford, Jill M Pulley, Daniel R Masys, Dan M Roden, Deede Wang, Christopher G Chute, Iftikhar J Kullo, David Carrell, Peggy Peissig, Abel Kho, Joshua C Denny.   

Abstract

We describe a two-stage analytical approach for characterizing morbidity profile dissimilarity among patient cohorts using electronic medical records. We capture morbidities using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-9) codes. In the first stage of the approach separate logistic regression analyses for ICD-9 sections (e.g., "hypertensive disease" or "appendicitis") are conducted, and the odds ratios that describe adjusted differences in prevalence between two cohorts are displayed graphically. In the second stage, the results from ICD-9 section analyses are combined into a general morbidity dissimilarity index (MDI). For illustration, we examine nine cohorts of patients representing six phenotypes (or controls) derived from five institutions, each a participant in the electronic MEdical REcords and GEnomics (eMERGE) network. The phenotypes studied include type II diabetes and type II diabetes controls, peripheral arterial disease and peripheral arterial disease controls, normal cardiac conduction as measured by electrocardiography, and senile cataracts.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20688191      PMCID: PMC2991387          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  26 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of the accuracy of clinical record retrieval using SNOMED-RT as compared with ICD9-CM.

Authors:  P L Elkin; A P Ruggieri; S H Brown; J Buntrock; B A Bauer; D Wahner-Roedler; S C Litin; J Beinborn; K R Bailey; L Bergstrom
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

Review 2.  The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome.

Authors:  Dianne L Groll; Teresa To; Claire Bombardier; James G Wright
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Phylogenetic analysis. Models and estimation procedures.

Authors:  L L Cavalli-Sforza; A W Edwards
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Accuracy of administrative data for identifying patients with pneumonia.

Authors:  Dominik Aronsky; Peter J Haug; Charles Lagor; Nathan C Dean
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Marylyn D Ritchie; Melissa A Basford; Jill M Pulley; Lisa Bastarache; Kristin Brown-Gentry; Deede Wang; Dan R Masys; Dan M Roden; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman; D P Wagner; E A Draper; D E Lawrence
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  19 in total

1.  Building bridges across electronic health record systems through inferred phenotypic topics.

Authors:  You Chen; Joydeep Ghosh; Cosmin Adrian Bejan; Carl A Gunter; Siddharth Gupta; Abel Kho; David Liebovitz; Jimeng Sun; Joshua Denny; Bradley Malin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 2.  Clinical Data Reuse or Secondary Use: Current Status and Potential Future Progress.

Authors:  S M Meystre; C Lovis; T Bürkle; G Tognola; A Budrionis; C U Lehmann
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

3.  Exploring generalized association rule mining for disease co-occurrences.

Authors:  Rhonda Kost; Benjamin Littenberg; Elizabeth S Chen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

4.  Identifying clinical/translational research cohorts: ascertainment via querying an integrated multi-source database.

Authors:  John F Hurdle; Stephen C Haroldsen; Andrew Hammer; Cindy Spigle; Alison M Fraser; Geraldine P Mineau; Samir J Courdy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Improving case definition of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in electronic medical records using natural language processing: a novel informatics approach.

Authors:  Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Tianxi Cai; Guergana Savova; Su-Chun Cheng; Pei Chen; Raul Guzman Perez; Vivian S Gainer; Shawn N Murphy; Peter Szolovits; Zongqi Xia; Stanley Shaw; Susanne Churchill; Elizabeth W Karlson; Isaac Kohane; Robert M Plenge; Katherine P Liao
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.325

6.  Development of reusable logic for determination of statin exposure-time from electronic health records.

Authors:  Aaron W Miller; Catherine A McCarty; Ulrich Broeckel; Vangelis Hytopoulos; Deanna S Cross
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Sex differences in reported pain across 11,000 patients captured in electronic medical records.

Authors:  David Ruau; Linda Y Liu; J David Clark; Martin S Angst; Atul J Butte
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 8.  Informatics and machine learning to define the phenotype.

Authors:  Anna Okula Basile; Marylyn DeRiggi Ritchie
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.225

9.  Use of diverse electronic medical record systems to identify genetic risk for type 2 diabetes within a genome-wide association study.

Authors:  Abel N Kho; M Geoffrey Hayes; Laura Rasmussen-Torvik; Jennifer A Pacheco; William K Thompson; Loren L Armstrong; Joshua C Denny; Peggy L Peissig; Aaron W Miller; Wei-Qi Wei; Suzette J Bielinski; Christopher G Chute; Cynthia L Leibson; Gail P Jarvik; David R Crosslin; Christopher S Carlson; Katherine M Newton; Wendy A Wolf; Rex L Chisholm; William L Lowe
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Developing an Algorithm to Detect Early Childhood Obesity in Two Tertiary Pediatric Medical Centers.

Authors:  Todd Lingren; Vidhu Thaker; Cassandra Brady; Bahram Namjou; Stephanie Kennebeck; Jonathan Bickel; Nandan Patibandla; Yizhao Ni; Sara L Van Driest; Lixin Chen; Ashton Roach; Beth Cobb; Jacqueline Kirby; Josh Denny; Lisa Bailey-Davis; Marc S Williams; Keith Marsolo; Imre Solti; Ingrid A Holm; John Harley; Isaac S Kohane; Guergana Savova; Nancy Crimmins
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.