Literature DB >> 22245360

Sex differences in reported pain across 11,000 patients captured in electronic medical records.

David Ruau1, Linda Y Liu, J David Clark, Martin S Angst, Atul J Butte.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Clinically recorded pain scores are abundant in patient health records but are rarely used in research. The use of this information could help improve clinical outcomes. For example, a recent report by the Institute of Medicine stated that ineffective use of clinical information contributes to undertreatment of patient subpopulations--especially women. This study used diagnosis-associated pain scores from a large hospital database to document sex differences in reported pain. We used de-identified electronic medical records from Stanford Hospital and Clinics for more than 72,000 patients. Each record contained at least 1 disease-associated pain score. We found over 160,000 pain scores in more than 250 primary diagnoses, and analyzed differences in disease-specific pain reported by men and women. After filtering for diagnoses with minimum encounter numbers, we found diagnosis-specific sex differences in reported pain. The most significant differences occurred in patients with disorders of the musculoskeletal, circulatory, respiratory and digestive systems, followed by infectious diseases, and injury and poisoning. We also discovered sex-specific differences in pain intensity in previously unreported diseases, including disorders of the cervical region, and acute sinusitis (P = .01, .017, respectively). Pain scores were collected during hospital encounters. No information about the use of pre-encounter over-the-counter medications was available. To our knowledge, this is the largest data-driven study documenting sex differences of disease-associated pain. It highlights the utility of electronic medical record data to corroborate and expand on results of smaller clinical studies. Our findings emphasize the need for future research examining the mechanisms underlying differences in pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article highlights the potential of electronic medical records to conduct large-scale pain studies. Our results are consistent with previous studies reporting pain differences between sexes and also suggest that clinicians should pay increased attention to this idea. Copyright Â
© 2012 American Pain Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22245360      PMCID: PMC3293998          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  32 in total

Review 1.  Sex-related hormonal influences on pain and analgesic responses.

Authors:  R B Fillingim; T J Ness
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Sex, gender, and pain: women and men really are different.

Authors:  R B Fillingim
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

3.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Impact of age, gender and cognitive functioning on pain perception.

Authors:  Gisèle Pickering; Didier Jourdan; Alain Eschalier; Claude Dubray
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 5.  Psychosocial contributions to sex-correlated differences in pain.

Authors:  Cynthia D Myers; Joseph L Riley; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Epidemiology, co-morbidity, and impact on health-related quality of life of self-reported headache and musculoskeletal pain--a gender perspective.

Authors:  Kerstin Bingefors; Dag Isacson
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.931

7.  Gender differences in chronic pain--findings from a population-based study of Norwegian adults.

Authors:  Tone Rustøen; Astrid Klopstad Wahl; Berit Rokne Hanestad; Anners Lerdal; Steven Paul; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.929

8.  Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  F Salaffi; G Leardini; B Canesi; A Mannoni; A Fioravanti; R Caporali; G Lapadula; L Punzi
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Genetic influence on variability in human acute experimental pain sensitivity associated with gender, ethnicity and psychological temperament.

Authors:  Hyungsuk Kim; John K Neubert; Anitza San Miguel; Ke Xu; Raj K Krishnaraju; Michael J Iadarola; David Goldman; Raymond A Dionne
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Influence of psychological factors on postoperative pain, mood and analgesic requirements.

Authors:  Paul Taenzer; Ronald Melzack; Mary Ellen Jeans
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  75 in total

Review 1.  The Val66Met brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene variant interacts with early pain exposure to predict cortisol dysregulation in 7-year-old children born very preterm: Implications for cognition.

Authors:  C M Y Chau; I L Cepeda; A M Devlin; J Weinberg; R E Grunau
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 2.  [Gender differences in acute and chronic pain conditions. Implications for diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  M Schopper; J Fleckenstein; D Irnich
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  The Curse of Curves: Sex Differences in the Associations Between Body Shape and Pain Expression.

Authors:  Jacob M Vigil; Chance R Strenth; Andrea A Mueller; Jared DiDomenico; Diego Guevara Beltran; Patrick Coulombe; Jane Ellen Smith
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2015-06

4.  Pain behind bars: the epidemiology of pain in older jail inmates in a county jail.

Authors:  Brie A Williams; Cyrus Ahalt; Irena Stijacic-Cenzer; Alexander K Smith; Joe Goldenson; Christine S Ritchie
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Patient-controlled epidural analgesia or multimodal pain regimen with periarticular injection after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Kethy M Jules-Elysee; Amanda K Goon; Geoffrey H Westrich; Douglas E Padgett; David J Mayman; Amar S Ranawat; Chitranjan S Ranawat; Yi Lin; Richard L Kahn; Devan D Bhagat; Enrique A Goytizolo; Yan Ma; Shane C Reid; Jodie Curren; Jacques T YaDeau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Quality of life improvement in aged patients after toenail surgery.

Authors:  Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo; Daniel López López; Patricia Palomo López; Alfredo Soriano Medrano; Ángel Morales Ponce; Marta Elena Losa Iglesias
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 7.  A review of the haematopoietic stem cell donation experience: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  A Billen; J A Madrigal; B E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Agreement between electronic medical record-based and self-administered pain numeric rating scale: clinical and research implications.

Authors:  Joseph L Goulet; Cynthia Brandt; Stephen Crystal; David A Fiellin; Cynthia Gibert; Adam J Gordon; Robert D Kerns; Stephen Maisto; Amy C Justice
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Medical and psychological risks and consequences of long-term opioid therapy in women.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall; Brett R Stacey; Roger Chou
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  Gender expression, sexual orientation and pain sensitivity in women.

Authors:  Jacob M Vigil; Lauren N Rowell; Charlotte Lutz
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.