Literature DB >> 28138819

Asymmetric competition for nectar between a large nectar thief and a small pollinator: an energetic point of view.

Eliška Padyšáková1,2,3, Jan Okrouhlík4, Mark Brown5, Michael Bartoš6,7, Štěpán Janeček6,7.   

Abstract

There are two alternative hypotheses related to body size and competition for restricted food sources. The first one supposes that larger animals are superior competitors because of their increased feeding abilities, whereas the second one assumes superiority of smaller animals because of their lower food requirements. We examined the relationship between two unrelated species of different size, drinking technique, energy requirements and roles in plant pollination system, to reveal the features of their competitive interaction and mechanisms enabling their co-existence while utilising the same nectar source. We observed diurnal feeding behaviour of the main pollinator, the carpenter bee Xylocopa caffra and a nectar thief, the northern double-collared sunbird Cinnyris reichenowi on 19 clumps of Hypoestes aristata (Acanthaceae) in Bamenda Highlands, Cameroon. For comparative purpose, we established a simplistic model of daily energy expenditure and daily energy intake by both visitor species assuming that they spend all available daytime feeding on H. aristata. We revealed the energetic gain-expenditure balance of the studied visitor species in relation to diurnal changes in nectar quality and quantity. In general, smaller energy requirements and related ability to utilise smaller resources made the main pollinator X. caffra competitively superior to the larger nectar thief C. reichenowi. Nevertheless, sunbirds are endowed with several mechanisms to reduce asymmetry in exploitative competition, such as the use of nectar resources in times of the day when rivals are inactive, aggressive attacks on carpenter bees while defending the nectar plants, and higher speed of nectar consumption.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Africa; Carpenter bee; Cinnyris; Hypoestes; Sunbird; Xylocopa

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28138819     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3817-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Do insect metabolic rates at rest and during flight scale with body mass?

Authors:  Jeremy E Niven; Jörn P W Scharlemann
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Evolution and persistence of obligate mutualists and exploiters: competition for partners and evolutionary immunization.

Authors:  Régis Ferrière; Mathias Gauduchon; Judith L Bronstein
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Energetics and pollination ecology.

Authors:  B Heinrich; P H Raven
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effect of sexual dimorphism in bill length on foraging behavior: an experimental analysis of hummingbirds.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; W Mark Roberts
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Dilute bird nectars: viscosity constrains food intake by licking in a sunbird.

Authors:  Angela Köhler; Carolina D C Leseigneur; Luke Verburgt; Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata : effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness.

Authors:  Rebecca E Irwin; Alison K Brody
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Comparison of the cost of short flights in a nectarivorous and a non-nectarivorous bird.

Authors:  C Hambly; B Pinshow; P Wiersma; S Verhulst; S B Piertney; E J Harper; J R Speakman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Group display in the socially monogamous Northern Double-collared Sunbird (Cinnyris reichenowi).

Authors:  Jan Riegert; Marcin Antczak; Drahomíra Fainová; Pavla Blažková
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Density-dependent effects of ants on selection for bumble bee pollination in Polemonium viscosum.

Authors:  Candace Galen; Jennifer C Geib
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Generalization versus specialization in pollination systems: visitors, thieves, and pollinators of Hypoestes aristata (Acanthaceae).

Authors:  Eliška Padyšáková; Michael Bartoš; Robert Tropek; Stěpán Janeček
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Near-neighbour optimal outcrossing in the bird-pollinated Anigozanthos manglesii.

Authors:  Bronwyn M Ayre; David G Roberts; Ryan D Phillips; Stephen D Hopper; Siegfried L Krauss
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.