Literature DB >> 20678704

Differentiation between intraoperative and postoperative bone tunnel widening and communication in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study.

Rainer Siebold1, Konstantin Cafaltzis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of intraoperative and postoperative bone tunnel enlargement and communication in double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients undergoing anatomic anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) 4-tunnel DB ACL reconstruction with a 5-strand hamstring graft and extracortical fixation were included in a prospective case series. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed on the second postoperative day and at 7 months' follow up to assess intraoperative and postoperative bone tunnel enlargement and communication. Tunnel widening was determined in different planes by digitally measuring the diameters of the AM and PL bone tunnels.
RESULTS: Intraoperative communication of the AM bone tunnel with the PL bone tunnel caused by drilling was observed in 23.8% of patients on the tibia and in no case on the femur. At 7 months postoperatively, significant bone tunnel widening occurred at all 4 bone tunnels. It was a mean of 20% for the tibial AM bone tunnel, 38% for the tibial PL bone tunnel, 34% for the femoral AM bone tunnel, and 46% for the femoral PL bone tunnel. Postoperative communication of the AM and PL bone tunnels caused by postoperative bone tunnel widening was observed in 19% of patients on the tibia and femur.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative bone tunnel communication in anatomic DB ACL reconstruction was caused by drilling and occurred only on the tibia. Significant postoperative bone tunnel widening occurred at all 4 bone tunnels and was the highest for the PL bone tunnel. Postoperative bone tunnel communication developed in 19% of patients on the tibia and femur and was caused by bone tunnel widening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series. 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20678704     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  31 in total

1.  Analysis of tunnel widening after double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Sheen-Woo Lee; Shin Woo Nam; Won Seok Oh; Jae Ang Sim; Ji Hoon Kwak; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A new technique in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using implant-free femoral fixation.

Authors:  Rodrigo Kancelskis Prado; Panagiotis G Ntagiopoulos; Patrícia M B Fucs; Nilson Roberto Severino; David Dejour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Transparent 3-dimensional CT in evaluation of femoral bone tunnel communication after ACL double-bundle reconstruction: comparison between outside-in and transportal technique.

Authors:  Tomohiro Tomihara; Gen Yoshida; Yo Hara; Masatoshi Taniuchi; Nagakazu Shimada
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison of femoral tunnel widening between outside-in and trans-tibial double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Beom Koo Lee; Won Seok Oh; Yong Kyun Cho
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Prospective randomized comparison of knee stability and joint degeneration for double- and single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Ran Sun; Bai-cheng Chen; Fei Wang; Xiao-feng Wang; Jing-qing Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: is there any difference in stability and function at 3-year followup?

Authors:  Alberto Gobbi; Vivek Mahajan; Georgios Karnatzikos; Norimasa Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement in 169 patients between single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kawaguchi; Eiji Kondo; Nobuto Kitamura; Shuken Kai; Masayuki Inoue; Kazunori Yasuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  One-stage revision ACL reconstruction after primary ACL double bundle reconstruction: is bone-patella tendon-bone autograft reliable?

Authors:  Tomohiro Tomihara; Yusuke Hashimoto; Masatoshi Taniuchi; Junsei Takigami; Changhun Han; Nagakazu Shimada
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Morphological changes in femoral tunnels after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuta Tachibana; Tatsuo Mae; Konsei Shino; Takashi Kanamoto; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa; Ken Nakata
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  A randomized prospective controlled study with 5-year follow-up of cross-pin femoral fixation versus metal interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Patrick Björkman; Jerker Sandelin; Arsi Harilainen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.