Literature DB >> 21667181

Single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: is there any difference in stability and function at 3-year followup?

Alberto Gobbi1, Vivek Mahajan, Georgios Karnatzikos, Norimasa Nakamura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a number of studies comparing postoperative stability and function after anatomic double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), it remains unclear whether double-bundle reconstruction improves stability or function. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked whether patients having single- and double-bundle ACLR using semitendinosus (ST) alone differed with regard to (1) postoperative stability; (2) ROM; and (3) five functional scores.
METHODS: We prospectively followed 60 patients with an isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Thirty patients underwent single-bundle and 30 patients underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clinically we assessed stability and range of motion (ROM); anteroposterior stability was assessed by Rolimeter and rotational stability by a pivot shift test. Function was assessed by IKDC, Noyes, Lysholm, Marx, and Tegner activity scales. The minimum followup was 36 months (mean, 46.2 months; range, 36-60 months).
RESULTS: Residual anteroposterior laxity at 3 years postoperatively was similar in both groups: 1.4 ± 0.3 mm versus 1.4 ± 0.2 mm, respectively. We observed no difference in the pivot shift test. ROM was similar in both groups, although double-bundle patients required more physical therapy sessions to gain full ROM. IKDC, Noyes, Lysholm, Marx, and Tegner scores were similar at final followup.
CONCLUSION: Double-bundle reconstruction of the ACL did not improve function or stability compared with single-bundle reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21667181      PMCID: PMC3270186          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1940-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  48 in total

1.  The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis.

Authors:  F G Girgis; J L Marshall; A Monajem
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons.

Authors:  Norimasa Nakamura; Shuji Horibe; Satoru Sasaki; Takuya Kitaguchi; Mituo Tagami; Tomoki Mitsuoka; Yukiyoshi Toritsuka; Masayuki Hamada; Konsei Shino
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Hamstring graft tibial fixation: biomechanical properties of different linkage systems.

Authors:  Alberto Gobbi; Sanjeev Mahajan; Benjamin Tuy; Ian Panuncialman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Patellar tendon versus quadrupled bone-semitendinosus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective clinical investigation in athletes.

Authors:  Alberto Gobbi; Sanjeev Mahajan; Milco Zanazzo; Benjamin Tuy
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Masayoshi Yagi; Eric K Wong; Akihiro Kanamori; Richard E Debski; Freddie H Fu; Savio L-Y Woo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons.

Authors:  N Adachi; M Ochi; Y Uchio; J Iwasa; M Kuriwaka; Y Ito
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-05

Review 7.  "Anatomic" anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of surgical techniques and reporting of surgical data.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Verena M Schreiber; Hector A Mejia; Kristian Samuelsson; C Niek van Dijk; Jon Karlsson; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee.

Authors:  R G Marx; T J Stump; E C Jones; T L Wickiewicz; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form.

Authors:  J J Irrgang; A F Anderson; A L Boland; C D Harner; M Kurosaka; P Neyret; J C Richmond; K D Shelborne
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts.

Authors:  Kevin B Freedman; Michael J D'Amato; David D Nedeff; Ari Kaz; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Can the pivot-shift be eliminated by anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Costanza Musiani; Papakonstantinou Vassilis; Marco Nitri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Double-bundle depiction of the anterior cruciate ligament at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  M E A P M Adriaensen; B Hogan; H I J Al-Bulushi; E C Kavanagh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Comparison of anterior and rotatory laxity using navigation between single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction: prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Sahnghoon Lee; Hyoungmin Kim; Jak Jang; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Prospective randomized comparison of knee stability and joint degeneration for double- and single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Ran Sun; Bai-cheng Chen; Fei Wang; Xiao-feng Wang; Jing-qing Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia Czuppon; Brad A Racette; Sandra E Klein; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Clinical outcomes and biomechanical analysis of posterolateral bundle augmentation in patients with partial anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  Takehiko Matsushita; Ryosuke Kuroda; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Daisuke Araki; Yuichi Hoshino; Kanto Nagai; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Gracilis and semitendinosus moment arm decreased by fascial tissue release after hamstring harvesting surgery: a key parameter to understand the peak torque obtained to a shallow angle of the knee.

Authors:  O Snoeck; B Beyer; M Rooze; P Salvia; J Coupier; H Bajou; V Feipel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  The evolution of primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction and recovery of early post-operative range of motion.

Authors:  Verena M Schreiber; Susan S Jordan; Gregory A Bonci; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Carola F van Eck; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.

Authors:  Thavatchai Tiamklang; Sermsak Sumanont; Thanit Foocharoen; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.