Literature DB >> 20677969

Factors associated with long-term patient satisfaction.

Nair Galvão Maia1, David Normando, Francisco Ajalmar Maia, Maria Angela Fernandes Ferreira, Maria do Socorro Costa Feitosa Alves.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with patient satisfaction at least 5 years after orthodontic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 209 orthodontic patients were included in the study. All subjects were treated with upper and lower fixed orthodontic appliances. Dental casts (n = 627) were examined using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index pretreatment (T1), at the end of treatment (T2) and at a long-term follow-up (mean, 8.5 years; T3). At T3, a Dental Impact on Daily Living questionnaire was used to assess the long-term effects of orthodontic treatment on daily living and satisfaction with the dentition. Multiple regression analyses were used to quantify associations between patient satisfaction and changes produced by the orthodontic treatment (PAR T2-T1), posttreatment stability (PAR T3), age at the start of treatment (T1), treatment duration (T2-T1), gender, and extraction.
RESULTS: Orthodontic treatment produced a significant improvement of 94.2% in the PAR Index (T2-T1), but this change was not associated with the level of satisfaction when the patient was questioned at least 5 years after treatment. Regression analysis showed that satisfaction was significantly associated only with the long-term posttreatment PAR index (r(2) = 0.125, P < .0001). No significant association was observed with the severity of malocclusion at the beginning (PAR-T1) or end of the orthodontic treatment (PAR-T2), age at T1, the amount of time taken during orthodontic treatment, gender, or extraction.
CONCLUSIONS: Over the long term, patient satisfaction is slightly associated with the stability of the orthodontic treatment regardless of the initial occlusal condition or the final result of the orthodontic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20677969      PMCID: PMC8929510          DOI: 10.2319/120909-708.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  18 in total

1.  Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years postretention.

Authors:  E A Al Yami; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; M A van 't Hof
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Mandibular second premolar extraction--postretention evaluation of stability and relapse.

Authors:  D C McReynolds; R M Little
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity.

Authors:  S Richmond; W C Shaw; K D O'Brien; I B Buchanan; R Jones; C D Stephens; C T Roberts; M Andrews
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Are orthognathic patients different?

Authors:  S J Cunningham; M S Gilthorpe; N P Hunt
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Factors associated with orthodontic stability: a retrospective study of 209 patients.

Authors:  Nair Galvão Maia; Antonio David Corrêa Normando; Francisco Ajalmar Maia; Maria Angêla Fernandes Ferreira; Maria Socorro Costa Feitosa Alves
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2010

6.  Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.

Authors:  K Birkeland; J Furevik; O E Bøe; P J Wisth
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Relationship between occlusion and satisfaction with dental appearance in orthodontically treated and untreated groups. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  K Birkeland; O E Bøe; P J Wisth
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention.

Authors:  R M Little; R A Riedel; J Artun
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Adolescents' perception of the quality of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Bodil Wilde Larsson; Kurt Bergström
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2005-06

10.  Orthodontic treatment demand and need in third and fourth grade schoolchildren.

Authors:  T T Wheeler; S P McGorray; L Yurkiewicz; S D Keeling; G J King
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  9 in total

1.  Lower fixed retainers: bonded on all teeth or only on canines? A systematic review.

Authors:  Larissa Barbosa Moda; Ana Luiza Correa da Silva Barros; Nathalia Carolina Fernandes Fagundes; David Normando; Lucianne Cople Maia; Sissy Maria Dos Anjos Mendes
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Long-term effects of Class II orthodontic treatment on oral health.

Authors:  N C Bock; M Saffar; H Hudel; M Evälahti; K Heikinheimo; D P C Rice; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Resilient Attachments as an Alternative to Conventional Cast Clasp Removable Partial Denture: 3-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Cristian Schuh; Jovito Adiel Skupien; Mauro Elias Mesko; Fernanda Valentini; Tatiana Pereira-Cenci; Noéli Boscato
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 4.  Negative online reviews of orthodontists: Content analysis of complaints posted by dissatisfied patients.

Authors:  Adam M Skrypczak; William A Tressel; Sara Ghayour; Roozbeh Khosravi; Douglas S Ramsay
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Facial divergence and mandibular crowding in treated subjects.

Authors:  Avrum I Goldberg; R G Behrents; Donald R Oliver; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Patient Satisfaction with Orthodontic Treatment Received in Public and Private Hospitals in Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulwahab Aljughaiman; Ali Alshammari; Abdullah Althumairi; Abdulaziz Alshammari; Naif Almasoud; Muhammad Ashraf Nazir
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-19

7.  Parental Satisfaction with Their Children's Rapid Palatal Expansion Treatment Provided by Orthodontists and Pediatric Dentists.

Authors:  Saleh H Alwadei; Khalid Almotiry; Amjad AlMawash; Farhan H Alwadei; Abdurahman H Alwadei
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Satisfaction with orthodontic treatment outcome.

Authors:  Ingalill Feldmann
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Satisfaction with orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Filiz Keles; Annemieke Bos
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.079

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.