Literature DB >> 9239958

Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.

K Birkeland1, J Furevik, O E Bøe, P J Wisth.   

Abstract

To assess the outcome of orthodontic treatment, 224 cases treated in a postgraduate clinic were evaluated. Pre-treatment (T1), post-treatment (T2) and 5-year follow-up (T3) study casts were assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. The influence of various factors upon treatment and long-term outcome was analysed. According to the PAR Index, orthodontic treatment reduced the malocclusions on average by 76.7 per cent, and at follow-up the reduction was 63.8 per cent. Follow-up stability was good for 76.3 per cent of the cases. Some cases (4.0 per cent) even improved, while moderate to severe post-treatment relapse occurred in 19.7 per cent of the cases. Orthodontic treatment changed Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions to near ideal occlusion (PAR scores 4.4-6.8). No long-term interaction between the groups was discovered. Sex and extraction/non-extraction treatments did not significantly affect the results. The initial PAR score accounted for 77.8 per cent of the variation in treatment PAR score change (T1-T2), and for 61.8 per cent of the variation of long-term PAR score change (T1-T3). Age at treatment start accounted significantly for the variability of treatment changes (P < 0.001). The PAR score at the end of treatment had some explanatory importance (R2 = 0.099) for the long-term (T1-T3) result. However, PAR score changes in the follow-up period were difficult to predict.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9239958     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/19.3.279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  16 in total

1.  Retrospective evaluation of the outcome of orthodontic treatment in adults.

Authors:  T Riedmann; R Berg
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Evaluation of objective and subjective treatment outcomes in orthodontic cases treated with extraction of a mandibular incisor.

Authors:  Sherry Lee; Fiona A Firth; Florence Bennani; Winifred Harding; Mauro Farella; Joseph S Antoun
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Orthodontic Class II:1 treatment-efficiency and outcome quality of Herbst-multibracket appliance therapy.

Authors:  N Bock; J Ruehl; S Ruf
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  What can be achieved with removable orthodontic appliances?

Authors:  Rainer-Reginald Miethke; Claudia Wronski
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system.

Authors:  Faruk Ayhan Basciftci; Mehmet Akin; Zehra Ileri; Sinem Bayram
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Posttreatment and physiologic occlusal changes comparison.

Authors:  Karina Maria S Freitas; Guilherme Janson; Bryan Tompson; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Tassiana Mesquita Simão; Fabrício Pinelli Valarelli; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Age-related long-term posttreatment occlusal and arch changes.

Authors:  Hyunjung Park; Jim C Boley; Richard A Alexander; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Factors associated with long-term patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Nair Galvão Maia; David Normando; Francisco Ajalmar Maia; Maria Angela Fernandes Ferreira; Maria do Socorro Costa Feitosa Alves
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Anterior tooth alignment: A comparison of orthodontic retention regimens 5 years posttreatment.

Authors:  Ragnar Bjering; Kari Birkeland; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 10.  [Health relevance of malocclusions and their treatment].

Authors:  Sabine Ruf; Peter Proff; Jörg Lisson
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.