Literature DB >> 2064071

Mandibular second premolar extraction--postretention evaluation of stability and relapse.

D C McReynolds1, R M Little.   

Abstract

The dental casts and cephalometric radiographs of 46 patients, treated with mandibular second premolar extraction and edgewise orthodontic mechanotherapy, were evaluated for changes over a minimum 10-year postretention period. The sample was divided into two groups: early (mixed dentition) extraction of mandibular second premolars and late (permanent dentition) extraction of mandibular second premolars. Results showed no difference in long-term stability between the two groups. Arch length and arch width decreased with time and incisor irregularity increased throughout the postretention period. No predictors or associations could be found to help the clinician in determining the long-term prognosis in terms of stability. The sample was regrouped according to the postretention degree of incisor irregularity. Statistically significant differences in cephalometric measurements were found between the minimally crowded group and the moderately to severely crowded group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2064071     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0133:MSPEPE>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  12 in total

Review 1.  The role of extraction in stability of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  B Kahl-Nieke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Influence of facial growth pattern on outcome of extraction therapy.

Authors:  U Hirschfelder; O Boulouchou; D Müssig; A Fleischer-Peters
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Combined orthodontic and surgical open bite correction.

Authors:  G William Arnett; Lorenzo Trevisiol; Elisabetta Grendene; Richard P McLaughlin; Antonio D'Agostino
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Long term dental transversal stability of Class II division 1 treated with cervical headgear.

Authors:  Márcio Bastos de Oliveira; Jean Nunes Dos Santos; Vanessa Mascarenhas Lima; Tiago Fonseca Lima da Fonte; Telma Martins de Araujo; Carlos Jorge Vogel; Emanuel Braga Rêgo
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-06-10

5.  A comparative study of two different clear aligner systems.

Authors:  Federica Ercoli; Michele Tepedino; Vincenzo Parziale; Cesare Luzi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Age-related long-term posttreatment occlusal and arch changes.

Authors:  Hyunjung Park; Jim C Boley; Richard A Alexander; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers.

Authors:  Stephen Barlin; Roland Smith; Ray Reed; Jonathan Sandy; Anthony John Ireland
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Factors associated with long-term patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Nair Galvão Maia; David Normando; Francisco Ajalmar Maia; Maria Angela Fernandes Ferreira; Maria do Socorro Costa Feitosa Alves
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 9.  Early vs late orthodontic treatment of tooth crowding by first premolar extraction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hibernon Lopes Filho; Lúcio H Maia; Thiago C L Lau; Margareth M G de Souza; Lucianne Cople Maia
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Wear resistance of four types of vacuum-formed retainer materials: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Taiyub A Raja; Simon J Littlewood; Theresa Munyombwe; Nigel L Bubb
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.