PURPOSE: To model the theoretical signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) behavior of 3-point chemical shift-based water-fat separation, using spectral modeling of fat, with experimental validation for spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging. The echo combination that achieves the best SNR performance for a given spectral model of fat was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cramér-Rao bound analysis was used to calculate the best possible SNR performance for a given echo combination. Experimental validation in a fat-water phantom was performed and compared with theory. In vivo scans were performed to compare fat separation with and with out spectral modeling of fat. RESULTS: Theoretical SNR calculations for methods that include spectral modeling of fat agree closely with experimental SNR measurements. Spectral modeling of fat more accurately separates fat and water signals, with only a slight decrease in the SNR performance of the water-only image, although with a relatively large decrease in the fat SNR performance. CONCLUSION: The optimal echo combination that provides the best SNR performance for water using spectral modeling of fat is very similar to previous optimizations that modeled fat as a single peak. Therefore, the optimal echo spacing commonly used for single fat peak models is adequate for most applications that use spectral modeling of fat. 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To model the theoretical signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) behavior of 3-point chemical shift-based water-fat separation, using spectral modeling of fat, with experimental validation for spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging. The echo combination that achieves the best SNR performance for a given spectral model of fat was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cramér-Rao bound analysis was used to calculate the best possible SNR performance for a given echo combination. Experimental validation in a fat-water phantom was performed and compared with theory. In vivo scans were performed to compare fat separation with and with out spectral modeling of fat. RESULTS: Theoretical SNR calculations for methods that include spectral modeling of fat agree closely with experimental SNR measurements. Spectral modeling of fat more accurately separates fat and water signals, with only a slight decrease in the SNR performance of the water-only image, although with a relatively large decrease in the fat SNR performance. CONCLUSION: The optimal echo combination that provides the best SNR performance for water using spectral modeling of fat is very similar to previous optimizations that modeled fat as a single peak. Therefore, the optimal echo spacing commonly used for single fat peak models is adequate for most applications that use spectral modeling of fat. 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Lidia S Szczepaniak; Pamela Nurenberg; David Leonard; Jeffrey D Browning; Jason S Reingold; Scott Grundy; Helen H Hobbs; Robert L Dobbins Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-08-31 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Huanzhou Yu; Jane W Johnson; Ann Shimakawa; Jean H Brittain; Norbert J Pelc; Christopher F Beaulieu; Garry E Gold Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Angel R Pineda; Zhifei Wen; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Garry E Gold; Christopher H Beaulieu; Norbert J Pelc Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Huanzhou Yu; Charles A McKenzie; Ann Shimakawa; Anthony T Vu; Anja C S Brau; Philip J Beatty; Angel R Pineda; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Leah C Henze Bancroft; Roberta M Strigel; Diego Hernando; Kevin M Johnson; Frederick Kelcz; Richard Kijowski; Walter F Block Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Houchun Harry Hu; Peter Börnert; Diego Hernando; Peter Kellman; Jingfei Ma; Scott Reeder; Claude Sirlin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 4.668