PURPOSE: To compare the iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) method with fat-saturated T1-weighted (T1W) and T2W fast spin-echo (FSE) and short-TI inversion recovery (STIR) imaging of the brachial plexus and cervical spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images acquired at 1.5T in five volunteers using fat-saturated T1W and T2W FSE imaging and STIR were compared with T1W and T2W IDEAL-FSE images. Examples of T1W and T2W IDEAL-FSE images acquired in patients are also shown. RESULTS: T1W and T2W IDEAL-FSE demonstrated superior fat suppression (P<0.05) and image quality (P<0.05), compared to T1W and T2W fat-saturated FSE, respectively. SNR performance of T1W-IDEAL-FSE was similar to T1W FSE in the spinal cord (P=0.250) and paraspinous muscles (P=0.78), while T2W IDEAL-FSE had superior SNR in muscle (P=0.02) and CSF (P=0.02), and marginally higher cord SNR (P=0.09). Compared to STIR, T2W IDEAL-FSE demonstrated superior image quality (P<0.05), comparable fat suppression (excellent, P=1.0), and higher SNR performance (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: IDEAL-FSE is a promising method for T1W and T2W imaging of the brachial plexus and cervical spine. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To compare the iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) method with fat-saturated T1-weighted (T1W) and T2W fast spin-echo (FSE) and short-TI inversion recovery (STIR) imaging of the brachial plexus and cervical spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images acquired at 1.5T in five volunteers using fat-saturated T1W and T2W FSE imaging and STIR were compared with T1W and T2W IDEAL-FSE images. Examples of T1W and T2W IDEAL-FSE images acquired in patients are also shown. RESULTS: T1W and T2W IDEAL-FSE demonstrated superior fat suppression (P<0.05) and image quality (P<0.05), compared to T1W and T2W fat-saturated FSE, respectively. SNR performance of T1W-IDEAL-FSE was similar to T1W FSE in the spinal cord (P=0.250) and paraspinous muscles (P=0.78), while T2W IDEAL-FSE had superior SNR in muscle (P=0.02) and CSF (P=0.02), and marginally higher cord SNR (P=0.09). Compared to STIR, T2W IDEAL-FSE demonstrated superior image quality (P<0.05), comparable fat suppression (excellent, P=1.0), and higher SNR performance (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: IDEAL-FSE is a promising method for T1W and T2W imaging of the brachial plexus and cervical spine. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Venkata V Chebrolu; Huanzhou Yu; Angel R Pineda; Charles A McKenzie; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Reed F Busse; Martin P Smith; Scott B Reeder; Neil M Rofsky; Jean H Brittain; Charles A McKenzie Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Houchun H Hu; Tai-Wei Wu; Larry Yin; Mimi S Kim; Jonathan M Chia; Thomas G Perkins; Vicente Gilsanz Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Filippo Del Grande; Francesco Santini; Daniel A Herzka; Michael R Aro; Cooper W Dean; Garry E Gold; John A Carrino Journal: Radiographics Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333