Literature DB >> 22520587

Musculotendon lengths and moment arms for a three-dimensional upper-extremity model.

Jeffery W Rankin1, Richard R Neptune.   

Abstract

Generating muscle-driven forward dynamics simulations of human movement using detailed musculoskeletal models can be computationally expensive. This is due in part to the time required to calculate musculotendon geometry (e.g., musculotendon lengths and moment arms), which is necessary to determine and apply individual musculotendon forces during the simulation. Modeling upper-extremity musculotendon geometry can be especially challenging due to the large number of multi-articular muscles and complex muscle paths. To accurately represent this geometry, wrapping surface algorithms and/or other computationally expensive techniques (e.g., phantom segments) are used. This paper provides a set of computationally efficient polynomial regression equations that estimate musculotendon length and moment arms for thirty-two (32) upper-extremity musculotendon actuators representing the major muscles crossing the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints. Equations were developed using a least squares fitting technique based on geometry values obtained from a validated public-domain upper-extremity musculoskeletal model that used wrapping surface elements (Holzbaur et al., 2005). In general, the regression equations fit well the original model values, with an average root mean square difference for all musculotendon actuators over the represented joint space of 0.39 mm (1.1% of peak value). In addition, the equations reduced the computational time required to simulate a representative upper-extremity movement (i.e., wheelchair propulsion) by more than two orders of magnitude (315 versus 2.3 s). Thus, these equations can assist in generating computationally efficient forward dynamics simulations of a wide range of upper-extremity movements.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22520587      PMCID: PMC3358406          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  17 in total

1.  A three-dimensional regression model of the shoulder rhythm.

Authors:  J H de Groot; R Brand
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Muscle forces analysis in the shoulder mechanism during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Hwai-Ting Lin; Fong-Chin Su; Hong-Wen Wu; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model of the shoulder.

Authors:  A A Nikooyan; H E J Veeger; P Westerhoff; B Bolsterlee; F Graichen; G Bergmann; F C T van der Helm
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Muscles that support the body also modulate forward progression during walking.

Authors:  May Q Liu; Frank C Anderson; Marcus G Pandy; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.

Authors:  Ge Wu; Frans C T van der Helm; H E J DirkJan Veeger; Mohsen Makhsous; Peter Van Roy; Carolyn Anglin; Jochem Nagels; Andrew R Karduna; Kevin McQuade; Xuguang Wang; Frederick W Werner; Bryan Buchholz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Differences in muscle function during walking and running at the same speed.

Authors:  Kotaro Sasaki; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control.

Authors:  Katherine R S Holzbaur; Wendy M Murray; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living.

Authors:  D J Magermans; E K J Chadwick; H E J Veeger; F C T van der Helm
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Muscle fiber type effects on energetically optimal cadences in cycling.

Authors:  Brian R Umberger; Karin G M Gerritsen; Philip E Martin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Muscle coordination of maximum-speed pedaling.

Authors:  C C Raasch; F E Zajac; B Ma; W S Levine
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  7 in total

1.  Forelimb muscle and joint actions in Archosauria: insights from Crocodylus johnstoni (Pseudosuchia) and Mussaurus patagonicus (Sauropodomorpha).

Authors:  Alejandro Otero; Vivian Allen; Diego Pol; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  The influence of wheelchair propulsion hand pattern on upper extremity muscle power and stress.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slowik; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Compensatory strategies during manual wheelchair propulsion in response to weakness in individual muscle groups: A simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slowik; Jill L McNitt-Gray; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  A comparison of static and dynamic optimization muscle force predictions during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Melissa M Morrow; Jeffery W Rankin; Richard R Neptune; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Finger muscle attachments for an OpenSim upper-extremity model.

Authors:  Jong Hwa Lee; Deanna S Asakawa; Jack T Dennerlein; Devin L Jindrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Forward dynamic optimization of handle path and muscle activity for handle based isokinetic wheelchair propulsion: A simulation study.

Authors:  Nithin Babu Rajendra Kurup; Markus Puchinger; Margit Gföhler
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Approximating complex musculoskeletal biomechanics using multidimensional autogenerating polynomials.

Authors:  Anton Sobinov; Matthew T Boots; Valeriya Gritsenko; Lee E Fisher; Robert A Gaunt; Sergiy Yakovenko
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.