Literature DB >> 21397232

Individual muscle contributions to push and recovery subtasks during wheelchair propulsion.

Jeffery W Rankin1, W Mark Richter, Richard R Neptune.   

Abstract

Manual wheelchair propulsion places considerable physical demand on the upper extremity and is one of the primary activities associated with the high prevalence of upper extremity overuse injuries and pain among wheelchair users. As a result, recent effort has focused on determining how various propulsion techniques influence upper extremity demand during wheelchair propulsion. However, an important prerequisite for identifying the relationships between propulsion techniques and upper extremity demand is to understand how individual muscles contribute to the mechanical energetics of wheelchair propulsion. The purpose of this study was to use a forward dynamics simulation of wheelchair propulsion to quantify how individual muscles deliver, absorb and/or transfer mechanical power during propulsion. The analysis showed that muscles contribute to either push (i.e., deliver mechanical power to the handrim) or recovery (i.e., reposition the arm) subtasks, with the shoulder flexors being the primary contributors to the push and the shoulder extensors being the primary contributors to the recovery. In addition, significant activity from the shoulder muscles was required during the transition between push and recovery, which resulted in increased co-contraction and upper extremity demand. Thus, strengthening the shoulder flexors and promoting propulsion techniques that improve transition mechanics have much potential to reduce upper extremity demand and improve rehabilitation outcomes.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21397232      PMCID: PMC3086712          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  45 in total

1.  The effect of seat position on manual wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: a quasi-static model-based approach.

Authors:  W M Richter
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Consequence of feedback-based learning of an effective hand rim wheelchair force production on mechanical efficiency.

Authors:  S de Groot; H E J Veeger; A P Hollander; L H V van der Woude
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  EMG feedback for the treatment of upper-extremity dysfunction: can it be effective?

Authors:  J Tries
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1989-03

4.  A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control.

Authors:  Katherine R S Holzbaur; Wendy M Murray; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Shoulder kinematics and kinetics during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Alicia M Koontz; Rory A Cooper; Michael L Boninger; Aaron L Souza; Brian T Fay
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

6.  Is effective force application in handrim wheelchair propulsion also efficient?

Authors:  D J J Bregman; S van Drongelen; H E J Veeger
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  The influence of altering push force effectiveness on upper extremity demand during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Jeffery W Rankin; Andrew M Kwarciak; W Mark Richter; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Effect of push frequency and strategy variations on economy and perceived exertion during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Victoria Louise Goosey-Tolfrey; Jennifer Helen Kirk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Effects of spinal cord injury level on the activity of shoulder muscles during wheelchair propulsion: an electromyographic study.

Authors:  Sara J Mulroy; Shawn Farrokhi; Craig J Newsam; Jacquelin Perry
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Comparing handrim biomechanics for treadmill and overground wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  A M Kwarciak; J T Turner; L Guo; W M Richter
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 2.772

View more
  25 in total

1.  Ultrasonographic comparison of the lateral epicondyle in wheelchair-user (and able-bodied) tennis players: A pilot study.

Authors:  Vivian Roy; Leah Lee; Michael Uihlein; Ishan Roy; Kenneth Lee
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Predictors of shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users.

Authors:  Shelby L Walford; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Effect of reverse manual wheelchair propulsion on shoulder kinematics, kinetics and muscular activity in persons with paraplegia.

Authors:  Lisa Lighthall Haubert; Sara J Mulroy; Philip S Requejo; Somboon Maneekobkunwong; JoAnne K Gronley; Jeffery W Rankin; Diego Rodriguez; Kristi Hong
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Shoulder pain and jerk during recovery phase of manual wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Chandrasekaran Jayaraman; Carolyn L Beck; Jacob J Sosnoff
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Biomechanical contributions of posterior deltoid and teres minor in the context of axillary nerve injury: a computational study.

Authors:  Dustin L Crouch; Johannes F Plate; Zhongyu Li; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Benchmarking of dynamic simulation predictions in two software platforms using an upper limb musculoskeletal model.

Authors:  Katherine R Saul; Xiao Hu; Craig M Goehler; Meghan E Vidt; Melissa Daly; Anca Velisar; Wendy M Murray
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 7.  Instruments and techniques for the analysis of wheelchair propulsion and upper extremity involvement in patients with spinal cord injuries: current concept review.

Authors:  Fabio Dellabiancia; Giuseppe Porcellini; Giovanni Merolla
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2013-08-11

8.  The influence of wheelchair propulsion hand pattern on upper extremity muscle power and stress.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slowik; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  The influence of wheelchair propulsion technique on upper extremity muscle demand: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeffery W Rankin; Andrew M Kwarciak; W Mark Richter; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Compensatory strategies during manual wheelchair propulsion in response to weakness in individual muscle groups: A simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slowik; Jill L McNitt-Gray; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.