OBJECTIVE: To assess parental health literacy and numeracy skills in understanding instructions for caring for young children, and to develop and validate a new parental health literacy scale, the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT). METHODS: Caregivers of infants (age <13 months) were recruited in a cross-sectional study at pediatric clinics at 3 academic medical centers. Literacy and numeracy skills were assessed with previously validated instruments. Parental health literacy was assessed with the new 20-item PHLAT. Psychometric analyses were performed to assess item characteristics and to generate a shortened, 10-item version (PHLAT-10). RESULTS: A total of 182 caregivers were recruited. Although 99% had adequate literacy skills, only 17% had better than ninth-grade numeracy skills. Mean score on the PHLAT was 68% (standard deviation 18); for example, only 47% of caregivers could correctly describe how to mix infant formula from concentrate, and only 69% could interpret a digital thermometer to determine whether an infant had a fever. Higher performance on the PHLAT was significantly correlated (P < .001) with education, literacy skill, and numeracy level (r = 0.29, 0.38, and 0.55 respectively). Caregivers with higher PHLAT scores were also more likely to interpret age recommendations for cold medications correctly (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.02, 2.6). Internal reliability on the PHLAT was good (Kuder-Richardson coefficient of reliability = 0.76). The PHLAT-10 also demonstrated good validity and reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Many parents do not understand common health information required to care for their infants. The PHLAT and PHLAT-10 have good reliability and validity and may be useful tools for identifying parents who need better communication of health-related instructions. Copyright 2010 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To assess parental health literacy and numeracy skills in understanding instructions for caring for young children, and to develop and validate a new parental health literacy scale, the Parental Health Literacy Activities Test (PHLAT). METHODS: Caregivers of infants (age <13 months) were recruited in a cross-sectional study at pediatric clinics at 3 academic medical centers. Literacy and numeracy skills were assessed with previously validated instruments. Parental health literacy was assessed with the new 20-item PHLAT. Psychometric analyses were performed to assess item characteristics and to generate a shortened, 10-item version (PHLAT-10). RESULTS: A total of 182 caregivers were recruited. Although 99% had adequate literacy skills, only 17% had better than ninth-grade numeracy skills. Mean score on the PHLAT was 68% (standard deviation 18); for example, only 47% of caregivers could correctly describe how to mix infant formula from concentrate, and only 69% could interpret a digital thermometer to determine whether an infant had a fever. Higher performance on the PHLAT was significantly correlated (P < .001) with education, literacy skill, and numeracy level (r = 0.29, 0.38, and 0.55 respectively). Caregivers with higher PHLAT scores were also more likely to interpret age recommendations for cold medications correctly (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.02, 2.6). Internal reliability on the PHLAT was good (Kuder-Richardson coefficient of reliability = 0.76). The PHLAT-10 also demonstrated good validity and reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Many parents do not understand common health information required to care for their infants. The PHLAT and PHLAT-10 have good reliability and validity and may be useful tools for identifying parents who need better communication of health-related instructions. Copyright 2010 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Darren A Dewalt; Nancy D Berkman; Stacey Sheridan; Kathleen N Lohr; Michael P Pignone Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Russell L Rothman; Ryan Housam; Hilary Weiss; Dianne Davis; Rebecca Gregory; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Ayumi Shintani; Tom A Elasy Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Anjali U Pandit; Joyce W Tang; Stacy Cooper Bailey; Terry C Davis; Mary V Bocchini; Stephen D Persell; Alex D Federman; Michael S Wolf Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-05-12
Authors: Kerri Cavanaugh; Mary Margaret Huizinga; Kenneth A Wallston; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Ayumi Shintani; Dianne Davis; Rebecca Pratt Gregory; Lynn Fuchs; Robb Malone; Andrea Cherrington; Michael Pignone; Darren A DeWalt; Tom A Elasy; Russell L Rothman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Tam H Nguyen; Hyunjeong Park; Hae-Ra Han; Kitty S Chan; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Jolie Haun; Miyong T Kim Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-07-29
Authors: Andrea K Morrison; Marilyn M Schapira; Marc H Gorelick; Raymond G Hoffmann; David C Brousseau Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Chandra Y Osborn; Kenneth A Wallston; Adam Shpigel; Kerri Cavanaugh; Sunil Kripalani; Russell L Rothman Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2013-02-21
Authors: H Shonna Yin; Lee M Sanders; Russell L Rothman; Alan L Mendelsohn; Benard P Dreyer; Richard O White; Joanne P Finkle; Stefania Prendes; Eliana M Perrin Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Eleanor Bathory; Suzy Tomopoulos; Russell Rothman; Lee Sanders; Eliana M Perrin; Alan Mendelsohn; Benard Dreyer; Maria Cerra; H Shonna Yin Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2016-03-12 Impact factor: 3.107