OBJECTIVE: Because existing numeracy measures may not optimally assess 'health numeracy', we developed and validated the General Health Numeracy Test (GHNT). METHODS: An iterative pilot testing process produced 21 GHNT items that were administered to 205 patients along with validated measures of health literacy, objective numeracy, subjective numeracy, and medication understanding and medication adherence. We assessed the GHNT's internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and explored its predictive validity. RESULTS: On average, participants were 55.0 ± 13.8 years old, 64.9% female, 29.8% non-White, and 51.7% had incomes ≤$39K with 14.4 ± 2.9 years of education. Psychometric testing produced a 6-item version (GHNT-6). The GHNT-21 and GHNT-6 had acceptable-good internal consistency reliability (KR-20=0.87 vs. 0.77, respectively). Both versions were positively associated with income, education, health literacy, objective numeracy, and subjective numeracy (all p<.001). Furthermore, both versions were associated with participants' understanding of their medications and medication adherence in unadjusted analyses, but only the GHNT-21 was associated with medication understanding in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The GHNT-21 and GHNT-6 are reliable and valid tools for assessing health numeracy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Brief, reliable, and valid assessments of health numeracy can assess a patient's numeracy status, and may ultimately help providers and educators tailor education to patients.
OBJECTIVE: Because existing numeracy measures may not optimally assess 'health numeracy', we developed and validated the General Health Numeracy Test (GHNT). METHODS: An iterative pilot testing process produced 21 GHNT items that were administered to 205 patients along with validated measures of health literacy, objective numeracy, subjective numeracy, and medication understanding and medication adherence. We assessed the GHNT's internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and explored its predictive validity. RESULTS: On average, participants were 55.0 ± 13.8 years old, 64.9% female, 29.8% non-White, and 51.7% had incomes ≤$39K with 14.4 ± 2.9 years of education. Psychometric testing produced a 6-item version (GHNT-6). The GHNT-21 and GHNT-6 had acceptable-good internal consistency reliability (KR-20=0.87 vs. 0.77, respectively). Both versions were positively associated with income, education, health literacy, objective numeracy, and subjective numeracy (all p<.001). Furthermore, both versions were associated with participants' understanding of their medications and medication adherence in unadjusted analyses, but only the GHNT-21 was associated with medication understanding in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The GHNT-21 and GHNT-6 are reliable and valid tools for assessing health numeracy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Brief, reliable, and valid assessments of health numeracy can assess a patient's numeracy status, and may ultimately help providers and educators tailor education to patients.
Authors: Russell L Rothman; Ryan Housam; Hilary Weiss; Dianne Davis; Rebecca Gregory; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Ayumi Shintani; Tom A Elasy Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Laura E Henderson; Ellen Y Chiu; Rashanda Robertson; Paul Kolm; Terry A Jacobson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rebecca L Sudore; Kala M Mehta; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara B Harris; Anne B Newman; Suzanne Satterfield; Caterina Rosano; Ronica N Rooks; Susan M Rubin; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Kristine Yaffe Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andrea J Apter; Jing Cheng; Dylan Small; Ian M Bennett; Claire Albert; Daniel G Fein; Maureen George; Simone Van Horne Journal: J Asthma Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Candace D McNaughton; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Sunil Kripalani; Russell L Rothman; Kenneth A Wallston Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Tam H Nguyen; Hyunjeong Park; Hae-Ra Han; Kitty S Chan; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Jolie Haun; Miyong T Kim Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-07-29
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Kathryn Goggins; Sam Nwosu; Jonathan Schildcrout; Amanda S Mixon; Candace McNaughton; Amanda M McDougald Scott; Kenneth A Wallston Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2015
Authors: Marilyn M Schapira; Cindy M Walker; Tamara Miller; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Pamela S Ganschow; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Diana Imbert; Maria O'Connell; Joan M Neuner Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2014
Authors: Kathleen Wolff; Laura Chambers; Stefan Bumol; Richard O White; Becky Pratt Gregory; Dianne Davis; Russell L Rothman Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: José A Tique; Leigh M Howard; Sandra Gaveta; Mohsin Sidat; Russell L Rothman; Sten H Vermund; Philip J Ciampa Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-03