Literature DB >> 27756700

Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Kevin C Dieter1, Jocelyn L Sy2, Randolph Blake2.   

Abstract

Normal binocular vision emerges from the combination of neural signals arising within separate monocular pathways. It is natural to wonder whether both eyes contribute equally to the unified cyclopean impression we ordinarily experience. Binocular rivalry, which occurs when the inputs to the two eyes are markedly different, affords a useful means for quantifying the balance of influence exerted by the eyes (called sensory eye dominance, SED) and for relating that degree of balance to other aspects of binocular visual function. However, the precise ways in which binocular rivalry dynamics change when the eyes are unbalanced remain uncharted. Relying on widespread individual variability in the relative predominance of the two eyes as demonstrated in previous studies, we found that an observer's overall tendency to see one eye more than the other was driven both by differences in the relative duration and frequency of instances of that eye's perceptual dominance. Specifically, larger imbalances between the eyes were associated with longer and more frequent periods of exclusive dominance for the stronger eye. Increases in occurrences of dominant eye percepts were mediated in part by a tendency to experience "return transitions" to the predominant eye - that is, observers often experienced sequential exclusive percepts of the dominant eye's image with an intervening mixed percept. Together, these results indicate that the often-observed imbalances between the eyes during binocular rivalry reflect true differences in sensory processing, a finding that has implications for our understanding of the mechanisms underlying binocular vision in general.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binocular rivalry; Binocular vision; Individual differences; Sensory eye dominance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27756700      PMCID: PMC5406270          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  48 in total

1.  Relative image size, not eye position, determines eye dominance switches.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Tandra Ghose; James M Hillis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Cumulative history quantifies the role of neural adaptation in multistable perception.

Authors:  Alexander Pastukhov; Jochen Braun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages.

Authors:  Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-03       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; David H Zald; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2007-11

5.  Results of ocular dominance testing depend on assessment method.

Authors:  Melissa L Rice; David A Leske; Christina E Smestad; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  The role of sensory ocular dominance on through-focus visual performance in monovision presbyopia corrections.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; Aixa Alarcon; Kevin C Dieter; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  How contrast affects stereoacuity.

Authors:  D L Halpern; R R Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Infant interocular acuity differences and binocular vision.

Authors:  E E Birch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  GABA shapes the dynamics of bistable perception.

Authors:  Anouk M van Loon; Tomas Knapen; H Steven Scholte; Elexa St John-Saaltink; Tobias H Donner; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  13 in total

1.  Frequency of alpha oscillation predicts individual differences in perceptual stability during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sucharit Katyal; Sheng He; Bin He; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Martin Golubitsky; Yukai Zhao; Yunjiao Wang; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Most nonpathological eyes present a small area of hyperreflective Henle's fiber layer on pupil-centered optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Xuanli Liu; Qin Zhu; Peirong Lu; David Gaucher; Jingyan Yao
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Attention cueing in rivalry: insights from pupillometry.

Authors:  Miriam Acquafredda; Paola Binda; Claudia Lunghi
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-03

5.  Shifting eye balance using monocularly directed attention in normal vision.

Authors:  Sandy P Wong; Alex S Baldwin; Robert F Hess; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Relative Spatial Frequency Processing Drives Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conscious Awareness.

Authors:  Elise A Piazza; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-19

7.  Psychophysical Tests Do Not Identify Ocular Dominance Consistently.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Eli Peli
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-04-29

8.  Visual Cortical Plasticity in Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; Lucia Galli-Resta; Paola Binda; Guido Marco Cicchini; Giorgio Placidi; Benedetto Falsini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Predictive context biases binocular rivalry in children and adults with no positive relation to two measures of social cognition.

Authors:  Christian Valuch; Louisa Kulke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  On Sensory Eye Dominance Revealed by Binocular Integrative and Binocular Competitive Stimuli.

Authors:  Chao Han; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.