BACKGROUND: In magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, T1, T2 and T2* relaxation times represent characteristic tissue properties that can be quantified with the help of specific imaging strategies. While there are basic software tools for specific pulse sequences, until now there is no universal software program available to automate pixel-wise mapping of relaxation times from various types of images or MR systems. Such a software program would allow researchers to test and compare new imaging strategies and thus would significantly facilitate research in the area of quantitative tissue characterization. RESULTS: After defining requirements for a universal MR mapping tool, a software program named MRmap was created using a high-level graphics language. Additional features include a manual registration tool for source images with motion artifacts and a tabular DICOM viewer to examine pulse sequence parameters. MRmap was successfully tested on three different computer platforms with image data from three different MR system manufacturers and five different sorts of pulse sequences: multi-image inversion recovery T1; Look-Locker/TOMROP T1; modified Look-Locker (MOLLI) T1; single-echo T2/T2*; and multi-echo T2/T2*. Computing times varied between 2 and 113 seconds. Estimates of relaxation times compared favorably to those obtained from non-automated curve fitting. Completed maps were exported in DICOM format and could be read in standard software packages used for analysis of clinical and research MR data. CONCLUSIONS: MRmap is a flexible cross-platform research tool that enables accurate mapping of relaxation times from various pulse sequences. The software allows researchers to optimize quantitative MR strategies in a manufacturer-independent fashion. The program and its source code were made available as open-source software on the internet.
BACKGROUND: In magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, T1, T2 and T2* relaxation times represent characteristic tissue properties that can be quantified with the help of specific imaging strategies. While there are basic software tools for specific pulse sequences, until now there is no universal software program available to automate pixel-wise mapping of relaxation times from various types of images or MR systems. Such a software program would allow researchers to test and compare new imaging strategies and thus would significantly facilitate research in the area of quantitative tissue characterization. RESULTS: After defining requirements for a universal MR mapping tool, a software program named MRmap was created using a high-level graphics language. Additional features include a manual registration tool for source images with motion artifacts and a tabular DICOM viewer to examine pulse sequence parameters. MRmap was successfully tested on three different computer platforms with image data from three different MR system manufacturers and five different sorts of pulse sequences: multi-image inversion recovery T1; Look-Locker/TOMROP T1; modified Look-Locker (MOLLI) T1; single-echo T2/T2*; and multi-echo T2/T2*. Computing times varied between 2 and 113 seconds. Estimates of relaxation times compared favorably to those obtained from non-automated curve fitting. Completed maps were exported in DICOM format and could be read in standard software packages used for analysis of clinical and research MR data. CONCLUSIONS: MRmap is a flexible cross-platform research tool that enables accurate mapping of relaxation times from various pulse sequences. The software allows researchers to optimize quantitative MR strategies in a manufacturer-independent fashion. The program and its source code were made available as open-source software on the internet.
Authors: L J Anderson; S Holden; B Davis; E Prescott; C C Charrier; N H Bunce; D N Firmin; B Wonke; J Porter; J M Walker; D J Pennell Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Patrick Sparrow; Daniel R Messroghli; Scott Reid; John P Ridgway; Gavin Bainbridge; Mohan U Sivananthan Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Daniel R Messroghli; Sven Plein; David M Higgins; Kevin Walters; Timothy R Jones; John P Ridgway; Mohan U Sivananthan Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marcelo Souto Nacif; Evrim B Turkbey; Neville Gai; Saman Nazarian; Rob J van der Geest; Radwa A Noureldin; Christopher T Sibley; Martin Ugander; Songtao Liu; Andrew E Arai; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Marcelo Souto Nacif; Nadine Kawel; Jason J Lee; Xinjian Chen; Jianhua Yao; Anna Zavodni; Christopher T Sibley; João A C Lima; Songtao Liu; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Martin Ugander; Abiola J Oki; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Andreas Greiser; Anthony H Aletras; Christopher T Sibley; Marcus Y Chen; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Juliano L Fernandes; Erika Fontana Sampaio; Monica Verissimo; Fabricio B Pereira; Jose Alvaro da Silva; Gabriel S de Figueiredo; Jose M Kalaf; Otavio R Coelho Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-08-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Emelie Lindgren; Ronnie Wirestam; Karin Markenroth Bloch; André Ahlgren; Matthias J P van Osch; Danielle van Westen; Yulia Surova; Freddy Ståhlberg; Linda Knutsson Journal: MAGMA Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Nadya Al-Wakeel-Marquard; Sanaz Rastin; Frédéric Muench; Darach O H-Ici; Sevim Yilmaz; Felix Berger; Titus Kuehne; Daniel R Messroghli Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: William S Bradham; Susan P Bell; Douglas W Adkisson; Holly M Smith; Frank E Harrell; Mark A Lawson; Henry Ooi; Douglas B Sawyer; Marvin W Kronenberg Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 5.712