Literature DB >> 20665893

Use of a reference tissue and blood vessel to measure the arterial input function in DCEMRI.

Xiaobing Fan1, Chad R Haney, Devkumar Mustafi, Cheng Yang, Marta Zamora, Erica J Markiewicz, Gregory S Karczmar.   

Abstract

Accurate measurement of the arterial input function is critical for quantitative evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data. Use of the reference tissue method to derive a local arterial input function avoided large errors associated with direct arterial measurements, but relied on literature values for K(trans) and v(e). We demonstrate that accurate values of K(trans) and v(e) in a reference tissue can be measured by comparing contrast media concentration in a reference tissue to plasma concentrations measured directly in a local artery after the 1-2 passes of the contrast media bolus-when plasma concentration is low and can be measured accurately. The values of K(trans) and v(e) calculated for the reference tissue can then be used to derive a more complete arterial input function including the first pass of the contrast bolus. This new approach was demonstrated using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data from rodent hind limb. Values obtained for K(trans) and v(e) in muscle, and the shape and amplitude of the derived arterial input function are consistent with published results.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665893      PMCID: PMC2992085          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  24 in total

1.  Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts.

Authors:  P S Tofts; A G Kermode
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Partial volume effect (PVE) on the arterial input function (AIF) in T1-weighted perfusion imaging and limitations of the multiplicative rescaling approach.

Authors:  Adam E Hansen; Henrik Pedersen; Egill Rostrup; Henrik B W Larsson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology.

Authors:  J L Evelhoch
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using Gd-DTPA: interindividual variability of the arterial input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors.

Authors:  R E Port; M V Knopp; G Brix
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Flow field mapping in the anesthetized rat.

Authors:  K M Joos; W F Blair; T D Brown; R H Gable
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.425

6.  New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors.

Authors:  Xiaobing Fan; Milica Medved; Jonathan N River; Marta Zamora; Claire Corot; Philippe Robert; Philippe Bourrinet; Martin Lipton; Rita M Culp; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  A method for interleaved acquisition of a vascular input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in experimental rat tumours.

Authors:  Dominick J O McIntyre; Christian Ludwig; Amit Pasan; John R Griffiths
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues.

Authors:  D A Kovar; M Lewis; G S Karczmar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: Variability and changes in tumor tissue over time.

Authors:  Milica Medved; Greg Karczmar; Cheng Yang; James Dignam; Thomas F Gajewski; Hedy Kindler; Everett Vokes; Peter MacEneany; Myrosia T Mitchell; Walter M Stadler
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Variation of the relaxographic "shutter-speed" for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Xin Li; Charles S Springer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  8 in total

1.  Response of HT29 colorectal xenograft model to cediranib assessed with 18 F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Louisa Bokacheva; Khushali Kotedia; Megan Reese; Sally-Ann Ricketts; Jane Halliday; Carl H Le; Jason A Koutcher; Sean Carlin
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Comparison of region-of-interest-averaged and pixel-averaged analysis of DCE-MRI data based on simulations and pre-clinical experiments.

Authors:  Dianning He; Marta Zamora; Aytekin Oto; Gregory S Karczmar; Xiaobing Fan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Correction of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver.

Authors:  Hesheng Wang; Yue Cao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and quantitative SPECT in a rat glioma model.

Authors:  Jack T Skinner; Thomas E Yankeelov; Todd E Peterson; Mark D Does
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Gaussian mixture model-based classification of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data for identifying diverse tumor microenvironments: preliminary results.

Authors:  S H Han; E Ackerstaff; R Stoyanova; S Carlin; W Huang; J A Koutcher; J K Kim; G Cho; G Jang; H Cho
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent, and AIFs derived from reference tissues.

Authors:  Shiyang Wang; Xiaobing Fan; Milica Medved; Federico D Pineda; Ambereen Yousuf; Aytekin Oto; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Imaging vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M O Leach; B Morgan; P S Tofts; D L Buckley; W Huang; M A Horsfield; T L Chenevert; D J Collins; A Jackson; D Lomas; B Whitcher; L Clarke; R Plummer; I Judson; R Jones; R Alonzi; T Brunner; D M Koh; P Murphy; J C Waterton; G Parker; M J Graves; T W J Scheenen; T W Redpath; M Orton; G Karczmar; H Huisman; J Barentsz; A Padhani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  High-field small animal magnetic resonance oncology studies.

Authors:  Louisa Bokacheva; Ellen Ackerstaff; H Carl LeKaye; Kristen Zakian; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.609

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.