Literature DB >> 20665516

Distributed low-frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation.

Nebojsa M Malesević1, Lana Z Popović, Laszlo Schwirtlich, Dejan B Popović.   

Abstract

We present a low-frequency stimulation method via multi-pad electrodes for delaying muscle fatigue. We compared two protocols for muscle activation of the quadriceps in paraplegics. One protocol involved a large cathode at 30 HZ (HPR, high pulse-rate), and the other involved four smaller cathodes at 16 HZ (LPR, low pulse-rate). The treatment included 30-min daily sessions for 20 days. One leg was treated with the HPR protocol and the other with the LPR protocol. Knee-joint torque was measured before and after therapy to assess the time interval before the knee-joint torque decreased to 70% of the initial value. The HPR therapy provided greater increases in muscle endurance and force in prolonged training. Yet the LPR stimulation produced less muscle fatigue compared to the HPR stimulation. The results suggest that HPR is the favored protocol for training, and LPR is better suited for prolonged stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665516     DOI: 10.1002/mus.21736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  27 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation for the suppression of pathological tremor.

Authors:  Lana Popović Maneski; Nikola Jorgovanović; Vojin Ilić; Strahinja Došen; Thierry Keller; Mirjana B Popović; Dejan B Popović
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Atlas of the muscle motor points for the lower limb: implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning.

Authors:  Alberto Botter; Gianmosè Oprandi; Fabio Lanfranco; Stefano Allasia; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Marco Alessandro Minetto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Motor unit recruitment during neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  C Scott Bickel; Chris M Gregory; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Electrical stimulation for neuromuscular testing and training: state-of-the art and unresolved issues.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Marco A Minetto; Dario Farina; Roberto Bottinelli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  A new paradigm of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the quadriceps femoris muscle.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Isabelle Vivodtzev; Marco A Minetto; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Functional electrical stimulation cycling strategies tested during preparation for the First Cybathlon Competition - a practical report from team ENS de Lyon.

Authors:  Amine Metani; Lana Popović-Maneski; Sebastien Mateo; Laura Lemahieu; Vance Bergeron
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2017-12-05

7.  Distributed stimulation increases force elicited with functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alie J Buckmire; Danielle R Lockwood; Cynthia J Doane; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  High-versus low-frequency stimulation effects on fine motor control in chronic hemiplegia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Barbara M Doucet; Lisa Griffin
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.119

9.  Mitigation of excessive fatigue associated with functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alie J Buckmire; Tapas J Arakeri; J P Reinhard; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Does increasing the number of channels during neuromuscular electrical stimulation reduce fatigability and produce larger contractions with less discomfort?

Authors:  Trevor S Barss; Bailey W M Sallis; Dylan J Miller; David F Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.