Trevor S Barss1,2, Bailey W M Sallis1,2, Dylan J Miller1,2, David F Collins3,4. 1. Human Neurophysiology Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, 4-219 Van Vliet Complex, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H9, Canada. 2. Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 3. Human Neurophysiology Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, 4-219 Van Vliet Complex, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H9, Canada. dcollins@ualberta.ca. 4. Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. dcollins@ualberta.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is often delivered at frequencies that recruit motor units (MUs) at unphysiologically high rates, leading to contraction fatigability. Rotating NMES pulses between multiple electrodes recruits subpopulations of MUs from each site, reducing MU firing rates and fatigability. This study was designed to determine whether rotating pulses between an increasing number of stimulation channels (cathodes) reduces contraction fatigability and increases the ability to generate torque during NMES. A secondary outcome was perceived discomfort. METHODS: Fifteen neurologically intact volunteers completed four sessions. NMES was delivered over the quadriceps through 1 (NMES1), 2 (NMES2), 4 (NMES4) or 8 (NMES8) channels. Fatigability was assessed over 100 contractions (1-s on/1-s off) at an initial contraction amplitude that was 20% of a maximal voluntary contraction. Torque-frequency relationships were characterized over six frequencies from 20 to 120 Hz. RESULTS: NMES4 and NMES8 resulted in less decline in peak torque (42 and 41%) over the 100 contractions than NMES1 and NMES2 (53 and 50% decline). Increasing frequency from 20 to 120 Hz increased torque by 7, 13, 21 and 24% MVC, for NMES1, NMES2, NMES4 and NMES8, respectively. Perceived discomfort was highest during NMES8. CONCLUSION: NMES4 and NMES8 reduced contraction fatigability and generated larger contractions across a range of frequencies than NMES1 and NMES2. NMES8 produced the most discomfort, likely due to small electrodes and high current density. During NMES, more is not better and rotating pulses between four channels may be optimal to reduce contraction fatigability and produce larger contractions with minimal discomfort compared to conventional NMES configurations.
PURPOSE: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is often delivered at frequencies that recruit motor units (MUs) at unphysiologically high rates, leading to contraction fatigability. Rotating NMES pulses between multiple electrodes recruits subpopulations of MUs from each site, reducing MU firing rates and fatigability. This study was designed to determine whether rotating pulses between an increasing number of stimulation channels (cathodes) reduces contraction fatigability and increases the ability to generate torque during NMES. A secondary outcome was perceived discomfort. METHODS: Fifteen neurologically intact volunteers completed four sessions. NMES was delivered over the quadriceps through 1 (NMES1), 2 (NMES2), 4 (NMES4) or 8 (NMES8) channels. Fatigability was assessed over 100 contractions (1-s on/1-s off) at an initial contraction amplitude that was 20% of a maximal voluntary contraction. Torque-frequency relationships were characterized over six frequencies from 20 to 120 Hz. RESULTS: NMES4 and NMES8 resulted in less decline in peak torque (42 and 41%) over the 100 contractions than NMES1 and NMES2 (53 and 50% decline). Increasing frequency from 20 to 120 Hz increased torque by 7, 13, 21 and 24% MVC, for NMES1, NMES2, NMES4 and NMES8, respectively. Perceived discomfort was highest during NMES8. CONCLUSION: NMES4 and NMES8 reduced contraction fatigability and generated larger contractions across a range of frequencies than NMES1 and NMES2. NMES8 produced the most discomfort, likely due to small electrodes and high current density. During NMES, more is not better and rotating pulses between four channels may be optimal to reduce contraction fatigability and produce larger contractions with minimal discomfort compared to conventional NMES configurations.
Authors: Trevor S Barss; Emily N Ainsley; Francisca C Claveria-Gonzalez; M John Luu; Dylan J Miller; Matheus J Wiest; David F Collins Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 3.966