Literature DB >> 29099387

Distributed stimulation increases force elicited with functional electrical stimulation.

Alie J Buckmire1,2, Danielle R Lockwood1, Cynthia J Doane3, Andrew J Fuglevand1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The maximum muscle forces that can be evoked using functional electrical stimulation (FES) are relatively modest. The reason for this weakness is not fully understood but could be partly related to the widespread distribution of motor nerve branches within muscle. As such, a single stimulating electrode (as is conventionally used) may be incapable of activating the entire array of motor axons supplying a muscle. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine whether stimulating a muscle with more than one source of current could boost force above that achievable with a single source. APPROACH: We compared the maximum isometric forces that could be evoked in the anterior deltoid of anesthetized monkeys using one or two intramuscular electrodes. We also evaluated whether temporally interleaved stimulation between two electrodes might reduce fatigue during prolonged activity compared to synchronized stimulation through two electrodes. MAIN
RESULTS: We found that dual electrode stimulation consistently produced greater force (~50% greater on average) than maximal stimulation with single electrodes. No differences, however, were found in the fatigue responses using interleaved versus synchronized stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: It seems reasonable to consider using multi-electrode stimulation to augment the force-generating capacity of muscles and thereby increase the utility of FES systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29099387      PMCID: PMC5818330          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa9820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  66 in total

1.  Voluntary strength and fatigue.

Authors:  P A MERTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Comparison of voluntary and electrical stimulation contraction torques*.

Authors:  J F Kramer; D M Lindsay; D Magee; T Wall; S W Mendryk
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Changes in quadriceps femoris muscle strength using isometric exercise versus electrical stimulation.

Authors:  R J Kubiak; K M Whitman; R M Johnston
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Electrical stimulation as a modality to improve performance of the neuromuscular system.

Authors:  Marc Vanderthommen; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.230

5.  Evaluation of voluntary and elicited dorsiflexor torque-angle relationships.

Authors:  T J Koh; W Herzog
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1995-12

6.  Force, pain and electrode size in the electrical stimulation of leg muscles.

Authors:  M Milner; A O Quanbury; J V Basmajian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Impairment of neuromuscular propagation during human fatiguing contractions at submaximal forces.

Authors:  A J Fuglevand; K M Zackowski; K A Huey; R M Enoka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Spatially distributed sequential stimulation reduces fatigue in paralyzed triceps surae muscles: a case study.

Authors:  Robert Nguyen; Kei Masani; Silvestro Micera; Manfred Morari; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 9.  Sihler's whole mount nerve staining technique: a review.

Authors:  L Mu; I Sanders
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.718

10.  Reduced fatigue in electrically stimulated muscle using dual channel intrafascicular electrodes with interleaved stimulation.

Authors:  K Yoshida; K Horch
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  7 in total

1.  Large-scale intramuscular electrode system for chronic electromyography and functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Nicole L Holly; Brady A Hasse; Katalin M Gothard; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  Restoration of complex movement in the paralyzed upper limb.

Authors:  Brady A Hasse; Drew E G Sheets; Nicole L Holly; Katalin M Gothard; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Effect of Athletic Training on Fatigue During Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Thomas J Abitante; Seward B Rutkove; Kevin R Duda; Dava J Newman
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  Mitigation of excessive fatigue associated with functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alie J Buckmire; Tapas J Arakeri; J P Reinhard; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Patient-specific functional electrical stimulation strategy based on muscle synergy and walking posture analysis for gait rehabilitation of stroke patients.

Authors:  Junghwan Lim; Taehyun Lim; Jungeun Lee; Junhyuk Sim; Hyungjun Chang; Bumchul Yoon; Hoeryong Jung
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  A Flexible Pulse Generator Based on a Field Programmable Gate Array Architecture for Functional Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Jorge A Mercado-Gutierrez; Ricardo Dominguez; Ignacio Hernandez-Popo; Jimena Quinzaños-Fresnedo; Arturo Vera-Hernandez; Lorenzo Leija-Salas; Josefina Gutierrez-Martinez
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Electrically Elicited Force Response Characteristics of Forearm Extensor Muscles for Electrical Muscle Stimulation-Based Haptic Rendering.

Authors:  Jungeun Lee; Yeongjin Kim; Hoeryong Jung
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.