Literature DB >> 23893829

High-versus low-frequency stimulation effects on fine motor control in chronic hemiplegia: a pilot study.

Barbara M Doucet1, Lisa Griffin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal parameters of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for recovery of hand function after stroke are not known. This clinical pilot study examined whether higher or lower frequencies are more effective for improving fine motor control of the hand in a chronic poststroke population.
METHODS: A 1-month, 4 times per week, in-home regimen of either a high-frequency (40 Hz) or low-frequency (20 Hz) NMES program was applied to the hemiplegic thenar muscles of 16 persons with chronic stroke. Participants were identified a priori as having a low level of function (LF) or a high level of function (HF). Outcome measures of strength, dexterity, and endurance were measured before and after participation in the regimen.
RESULTS: LF subjects showed no significant changes with either the high- or the low-frequency NMES regimen. HF subjects showed significant changes in strength, dexterity, and endurance. Within this group, higher frequencies of stimulation yielded strength gains and increased motor activation; lower frequencies affected dexterity and endurance.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that higher frequencies of stimulation could be more effective in improving strength and motor activation properties and that lower frequencies may affect coordination and endurance changes. Results also indicate that persons with a higher functional level of recovery may respond more favorably to NMES regimens, but further study with larger patient groups is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23893829      PMCID: PMC4167381          DOI: 10.1310/tsr2004-299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil        ISSN: 1074-9357            Impact factor:   2.119


  55 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of muscle wisdom in the human adductor pollicis using physiological rates of stimulation.

Authors:  Andrew J Fuglevand; Douglas A Keen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Strength training improves the tri-digit finger-pinch force control of older adults.

Authors:  Justin W Keogh; Steve Morrison; Rod Barrett
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  The effect of age on the grip force control in lateral grip.

Authors:  G Kurillo; T Bajd; M Tercelj
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

4.  Dose-response relation between neuromuscular electrical stimulation and upper-extremity function in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Shu-Shyuan Hsu; Ming-Hsia Hu; Yen-Ho Wang; Ping-Keung Yip; Jan-Wei Chiu; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Long-term effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for promoting motor recovery of the upper extremity after stroke.

Authors:  Ziling Lin; Tiebin Yan
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The contribution of the intrinsic muscles to grip and pinch strength.

Authors:  S H Kozin; S Porter; P Clark; J J Thoder
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  The impact of somatosensory function on activity performance and length of hospital stay in geriatric patients with stroke.

Authors:  Disa Kathryn Sommerfeld; Magnus H von Arbin
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.477

8.  Effects of electrical stimulation parameters on fatigue in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Christopher D Black; Christopher P Elder; Gary A Dudley
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; J Vive-Larsen; M Støier; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 10.  Review of the randomized clinical stroke rehabilitation trials in 2009.

Authors:  Meheroz H Rabadi
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Muscle Impairment: Critical Review and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ethne L Nussbaum; Pamela Houghton; Joseph Anthony; Sandy Rennie; Barbara L Shay; Alison M Hoens
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training on Endurance Performance.

Authors:  Menno P Veldman; Julien Gondin; Nicolas Place; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  The use of functional electrical stimulation to improve upper limb function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Luisa C Garzon; Lauren Switzer; Kristin E Musselman; Darcy Fehlings
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2018-05-14

4.  A randomised clinical trial comparing 35 Hz versus 50 Hz frequency stimulation effects on hand motor recovery in older adults after stroke.

Authors:  Trinidad Sentandreu-Mañó; José M Tomás; J Ricardo Salom Terrádez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.