Literature DB >> 20665410

Objective measures in aesthetic and functional nasal surgery: perspectives on nasal form and function.

Sachin S Pawar1, Guilherme J M Garcia, Julia S Kimbell, John S Rhee.   

Abstract

The outcomes of aesthetic and functional nasal surgery are difficult to assess objectively because of the intricate balance between nasal form and function. Despite historical emphasis on patient-reported subjective measures, objective measures are gaining importance in both research and the current outcomes-driven health care environment. Objective measures currently available have several shortcomings that limit their routine clinical use. In particular, the low correlation between objective and subjective measures poses a major challenge. However, advances in computer, imaging, and bioengineering technology are now setting the stage for the development of innovative objective assessment tools for nasal surgery that can potentially address some of the current limitations. Assessment of nasal form after aesthetic surgery is evolving from two-dimensional analysis to more sophisticated three-dimensional analysis. Similarly, assessment of nasal function is evolving with the introduction of computational fluid dynamics techniques, which allow for a detailed description of the biophysics of nasal airflow. In this article, we present an overview of objective measures in both aesthetic and functional nasal surgery and discuss future trends and applications that have the potential to change the way we assess nasal form and function. (c) Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665410      PMCID: PMC3073127          DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 0736-6825            Impact factor:   1.446


  57 in total

1.  Use of a portable spirometer for studies on the nasal cycle.

Authors:  J Hanif; R Eccles; S S Jawad
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Accuracy of acoustic rhinometry measurements.

Authors:  O Cakmak; H Celik; T Ergin; L Sennaroglu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  Outcomes of facial cosmetic procedures.

Authors:  Sam P Most; Ramsey Alsarraf; Wayne F Larrabee
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.446

4.  Investigating the nasal cycle using endoscopy, rhinoresistometry, and acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  Christian Lang; Stefan Grützenmacher; Barbara Mlynski; Stefan Plontke; Gunter Mlynski
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Craniofacial applications of three-dimensional laser surface scanning.

Authors:  Adriana C Da Silveira; Joseph L Daw; Budi Kusnoto; Carla Evans; Mimis Cohen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Septal deviation and nasal resistance: an investigation using virtual surgery and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Guilherme J M Garcia; John S Rhee; Brent A Senior; Julia S Kimbell
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.467

7.  Effects of differences in nasal anatomy on airflow distribution: a comparison of four individuals at rest.

Authors:  Rebecca A Segal; Grace M Kepler; Julia S Kimbell
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  A study to assess the usefulness of a portable spirometer to quantify the severity of nasal septal deviation.

Authors:  Junaid Hanif; Suhair S M Jawad; Ron Eccles
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Role of nasal valve in the surgically corrected nasal respiratory obstruction: evaluation through rhinomanometry.

Authors:  E Ricci; F Palonta; G Preti; N Vione; G Nazionale; R Albera; A Staffieri; G Cortesina; A L Cavalot
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

10.  Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results.

Authors:  Paulo Borges Dinis; Haula Haider
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

View more
  22 in total

1.  Computed nasal resistance compared with patient-reported symptoms in surgically treated nasal airway passages: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Julia S Kimbell; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank; Daniel E Cannon; Sachin S Pawar; John S Rhee
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.467

2.  Nasal obstruction following septorhinoplasty: how well does acoustic rhinometry work?

Authors:  Deniz Tuna Edizer; Ferhat Erisir; Yalcin Alimoglu; Seher Gokce
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The role of three-dimensional CT in the evaluation of nasal structures and anomalies.

Authors:  Gennaro Graviero; Luca Guastini; Renzo Mora; Giovanni Salzano; Francesco Antonio Salzano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  A systematic review of patient-reported nasal obstruction scores: defining normative and symptomatic ranges in surgical patients.

Authors:  John S Rhee; Corbin D Sullivan; Dennis O Frank; Julia S Kimbell; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.611

5.  Role of virtual surgery in preoperative planning: assessing the individual components of functional nasal airway surgery.

Authors:  John S Rhee; Daniel E Cannon; Dennis O Frank; Julia S Kimbell
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct

6.  Simulating the nasal cycle with computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Ruchin G Patel; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; John S Rhee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Identifying patients who may benefit from inferior turbinate reduction using computer simulations.

Authors:  Benjamin M Hariri; John S Rhee; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Deviated nasal septum hinders intranasal sprays: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  D O Frank; J S Kimbell; D Cannon; S S Pawar; J S Rhee
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Characterization of postoperative changes in nasal airflow using a cadaveric computational fluid dynamics model: supporting the internal nasal valve.

Authors:  Scott Shadfar; William W Shockley; Gita M Fleischman; Anand R Dugar; Kibwei A McKinney; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.611

10.  Predicting postsurgery nasal physiology with computational modeling: current challenges and limitations.

Authors:  Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; Purushottam Laud; Guilherme J M Garcia; John S Rhee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.