Literature DB >> 18777212

Effects of differences in nasal anatomy on airflow distribution: a comparison of four individuals at rest.

Rebecca A Segal1, Grace M Kepler, Julia S Kimbell.   

Abstract

Differences in nasal anatomy among human subjects may cause significant differences in respiratory airflow patterns and subsequent dosimetry of inhaled gases and particles in the respiratory tract. This study used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to study inter-individual differences in nasal airflow among four healthy individuals. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were digitized and nasal-surface-area-to-volume ratios (SAVR) were calculated for 15 adults. Two males and two females, representative of the range of SAVR values, were selected for flow analysis. Nasal CFD models were constructed for each subject by a semi-automated process that provided input to a commercial mesh generator to generate structured hexahedral meshes (Gambit, Fluent, Inc., Lebanon, NH, USA). Steady-state inspiratory laminar airflow at 15 L/min was calculated using commercial CFD software (FIDAP, Fluent, Inc., Lebanon, NH, USA). Streamline patterns, velocities, and helicity values were compared. In all subjects, the majority of flow passed through the middle and ventral regions of the nasal passages; however, the amount and location of swirling flow differed among individuals. Cross-sectional flow allocation analysis also indicated inter-individual differences. Laboratory water-dye experiments confirmed streamlines and velocity magnitudes predicted by the computational model. These results suggest that significant inter-individual differences exist in bulk airflow patterns in the nose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18777212     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-008-9556-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  14 in total

1.  Numerical simulation of pharyngeal airflow applied to obstructive sleep apnea: effect of the nasal cavity in anatomically accurate airway models.

Authors:  Julien Cisonni; Anthony D Lucey; Andrew J C King; Syed Mohammed Shamsul Islam; Richard Lewis; Mithran S Goonewardene
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Particle transport and deposition: basic physics of particle kinetics.

Authors:  Akira Tsuda; Frank S Henry; James P Butler
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 9.090

3.  Improving the lung delivery of nasally administered aerosols during noninvasive ventilation-an application of enhanced condensational growth (ECG).

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Geng Tian; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.849

4.  Current understanding of nasal morphology and physiology as a drug delivery target.

Authors:  Julie D Suman
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Impact of endoscopic craniofacial resection on simulated nasal airflow and heat transport.

Authors:  Lauren F Tracy; Saikat Basu; Parth V Shah; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Snigdha Das; Adam M Zanation; Julia S Kimbell
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.858

6.  Objective measures in aesthetic and functional nasal surgery: perspectives on nasal form and function.

Authors:  Sachin S Pawar; Guilherme J M Garcia; Julia S Kimbell; John S Rhee
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 1.446

7.  Variability in Nose-to-Lung Aerosol Delivery.

Authors:  Ross L Walenga; Geng Tian; Michael Hindle; Joshua Yelverton; Kelley Dodson; P Worth Longest
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.433

8.  What is normal nasal airflow? A computational study of 22 healthy adults.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.858

9.  Role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on olfactory airflow dynamics.

Authors:  Ryan M Sicard; Dennis O Frank-Ito
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Standardization of Malaysian adult female nasal cavity.

Authors:  Chih Fang Lee; Mohd Zulkifly Abdullah; Kamarul Arifin Ahmad; Ibrahim Lutfi Shuaib
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.