Literature DB >> 22045159

Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities.

Nikhil Pawa1, Tan Arulampalam, John D Norton.   

Abstract

It has been estimated that >95% of cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) would benefit from curative surgery if diagnosis was made at an early or premalignant polyp stage of disease. Over the past 10 years, most developed nation states have implemented mass population screening programs, which are typically targeted at the older (at-risk) age group (>50-60 years old). Conventional screening largely relies on periodic patient-centric investigation, particularly involving colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy, or else on the fecal occult blood test. These methods are compromised by either low cost-effectiveness or limited diagnostic accuracy. Advances in the development of diagnostic molecular markers for CRC have yielded an expanding list of potential new screening modalities based on investigations of patient stool (for colonocyte DNA mutations, epigenetic changes or microRNA expression) or blood specimens (for plasma DNA mutations, epigenetic changes, heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA mutations, leukocyte transcriptome profile, plasma microRNA expression or protein and autoantibody expression). In this Review, we present a critical evaluation of the performance data and relative merits of these various new potential methods. None of these molecular diagnostic methods have yet been evaluated beyond the proof-of-principle and pilot-scale study stage and it could be some years before they replace existing methods for population screening in CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22045159     DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1759-5045            Impact factor:   46.802


  138 in total

1.  The impact of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening on the UK NHS: costs, healthcare resources and health outcomes.

Authors:  Alison Sweet; David Lee; Kerry Gairy; Denver Phiri; Timothy Reason; Kevin Lock
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.561

2.  Isolation and characterization of circulating tumor cells from patients with localized and metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shannon L Stott; Richard J Lee; Sunitha Nagrath; Min Yu; David T Miyamoto; Lindsey Ulkus; Elizabeth J Inserra; Matthew Ulman; Simeon Springer; Zev Nakamura; Alessandra L Moore; Dina I Tsukrov; Maria E Kempner; Douglas M Dahl; Chin-Lee Wu; A John Iafrate; Matthew R Smith; Ronald G Tompkins; Lecia V Sequist; Mehmet Toner; Daniel A Haber; Shyamala Maheswaran
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Detection of colorectal cancer using MALDI-TOF serum protein profiling.

Authors:  Mirre E de Noo; Bart J A Mertens; Aliye Ozalp; Marco R Bladergroen; Martijn P J van der Werff; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Andre M Deelder; Rob A E M Tollenaar
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer: correlation with clinical and pathological variables.

Authors:  J Sastre; M L Maestro; J Puente; S Veganzones; R Alfonso; S Rafael; J A García-Saenz; M Vidaurreta; M Martín; M Arroyo; M T Sanz-Casla; E Díaz-Rubio
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Matrix-insensitive protein assays push the limits of biosensors in medicine.

Authors:  Richard S Gaster; Drew A Hall; Carsten H Nielsen; Sebastian J Osterfeld; Heng Yu; Kathleen E Mach; Robert J Wilson; Boris Murmann; Joseph C Liao; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Shan X Wang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-10-11       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 6.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  As tests evolve and costs of cancer care rise: reappraising stool-based screening for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  M Parekh; A M Fendrick; U Ladabaum
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Martina M Morrin; Jonathan B Kruskal; Philip T Lavin; Max P Rosen; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Blood markers for early detection of colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sabrina Hundt; Ulrike Haug; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  David Lieberman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Advances in epigenetic biomarker research in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Ye-Ye Kuang; Xiao-Tong Hu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Circulating CD16+CD56+ nature killer cells indicate the prognosis of colorectal cancer after initial chemotherapy.

Authors:  Feng Cui; Di Qu; Ruya Sun; Kejun Nan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  An evaluation of treatment results of emergency versus elective surgery in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Bahattin Bayar; Kerim Bora Yılmaz; Melih Akıncı; Alpaslan Şahin; Hakan Kulaçoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-08-18

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer screening in countries of European Council outside of the EU-28.

Authors:  Emma Altobelli; Francesco D'Aloisio; Paolo Matteo Angeletti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Detection of SPG20 gene promoter-methylated DNA, as a novel epigenetic biomarker, in plasma for colorectal cancer diagnosis using the MethyLight method.

Authors:  Nayebali Rezvani; Reza Alibakhshi; Assad Vaisi-Raygani; Homayoon Bashiri; Massoud Saidijam
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Circ_0101802 Facilitates Colorectal Cancer Progression Depending on the Regulation of miR-665/DVL3 Signaling.

Authors:  Jun Li; Xinbin Liu; Shaoting Dong; Haojie Liao; Weizhen Huang; Xia Yuan
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 1.890

Review 7.  Stool DNA methylation assays in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Tanya Kadiyska; Alexander Nossikoff
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Auto-antibodies to p53 and the Subsequent Development of Colorectal Cancer in a U.S. Prospective Cohort Consortium.

Authors:  Julia Butt; William J Blot; Kala Visvanathan; Loïc Le Marchand; Lynne R Wilkens; Yu Chen; Howard D Sesso; Lauren Teras; Marc D Ryser; Terry Hyslop; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Lesley F Tinker; John D Potter; Mingyang Song; Sonja I Berndt; Tim Waterboer; Michael Pawlita; Meira Epplein
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  MiRNAs and LincRNAs: Could they be considered as biomarkers in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Ruth Zarate; Valentina Boni; Eva Bandres; Jesús Garcia-Foncillas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  Identification and evaluation of plasma microRNAs for early detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoya Luo; Christian Stock; Barbara Burwinkel; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.