Literature DB >> 20663819

The time to measure positional information: maternal hunchback is required for the synchrony of the Bicoid transcriptional response at the onset of zygotic transcription.

Aude Porcher1, Asmahan Abu-Arish, Sébastien Huart, Baptiste Roelens, Cécile Fradin, Nathalie Dostatni.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted that morphogenetic gradients determine cell identity by concentration-dependent activation of target genes. How precise is each step in the gene expression process that acts downstream of morphogens, however, remains unclear. The Bicoid morphogen is a transcription factor directly activating its target genes and provides thus a simple system to address this issue in a quantitative manner. Recent studies indicate that the Bicoid gradient is precisely established in Drosophila embryos after eight nuclear divisions (cycle 9) and that target protein expression is specified five divisions later (cycle 14), with a precision that corresponds to a relative difference of Bicoid concentration of 10%. To understand how such precision was achieved, we directly analyzed nascent transcripts of the hunchback target gene at their site of synthesis. Most anterior nuclei in cycle 11 interphasic embryos exhibit efficient biallelic transcription of hunchback and this synchronous expression is specified within a 10% difference of Bicoid concentration. The fast diffusion of Bcd-EGFP (7.7 mum(2)/s) that we captured by fluorescent correlation spectroscopy in the nucleus is consistent with this robust expression at cycle 11. However, given the interruption of transcription during mitosis, it remains too slow to be consistent with precise de novo reading of Bicoid concentration at each interphase, suggesting the existence of a memorization process that recalls this information from earlier cycles. The two anterior maternal morphogens, Bicoid and Hunchback, contribute differently to this early response: whereas Bicoid provides dose-dependent positional information along the axis, maternal Hunchback is required for the synchrony of the response and is therefore likely to be involved in this memorization process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20663819     DOI: 10.1242/dev.051300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  47 in total

Review 1.  Transcriptional activators and activation mechanisms.

Authors:  Jun Ma
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 14.870

2.  Evaluating the Drosophila Bicoid morphogen gradient system through dissecting the noise in transcriptional bursts.

Authors:  Feng He; Jie Ren; Wei Wang; Jun Ma
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Analytic approaches to stochastic gene expression in multicellular systems.

Authors:  Alistair Nicol Boettiger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Morphogen gradient formation and action: insights from studying Bicoid protein degradation.

Authors:  Junbo Liu; Feng He; Jun Ma
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.160

5.  Morphogen transport.

Authors:  Patrick Müller; Katherine W Rogers; Shuizi R Yu; Michael Brand; Alexander F Schier
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Improved readout precision of the Bicoid morphogen gradient by early decoding.

Authors:  Zvi Tamari; Naama Barkai
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.365

7.  Scaling of the Bicoid morphogen gradient by a volume-dependent production rate.

Authors:  David Cheung; Cecelia Miles; Martin Kreitman; Jun Ma
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Modulation of temporal dynamics of gene transcription by activator potency in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Junbo Liu; Jun Ma
Journal:  Development       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Adaptation of the length scale and amplitude of the Bicoid gradient profile to achieve robust patterning in abnormally large Drosophila melanogaster embryos.

Authors:  David Cheung; Cecelia Miles; Martin Kreitman; Jun Ma
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Transcriptional Memory in the Drosophila Embryo.

Authors:  Teresa Ferraro; Emilia Esposito; Laure Mancini; Sam Ng; Tanguy Lucas; Mathieu Coppey; Nathalie Dostatni; Aleksandra M Walczak; Michael Levine; Mounia Lagha
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.