Hui-Dong Wu1,2,3, Wei Liu4, Man-Sang Wong5. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 3. Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University-Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 4. School of Rehabilitation, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China. 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China. m.s.wong@polyu.edu.hk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Clinical ultrasound is radiation-free, low cost and user friendly, which makes it probable in assessment of scoliosis. Numerous studies have been conducted about the feasibility of using clinical ultrasound to assess scoliosis; thus, an inclusive review of the literature would be beneficial for researchers, clinicians and patients. This study aimed to systematically review the reliability and validity of coronal curvature assessments obtained from different clinical ultrasound imaging methods. METHODS: A comprehensive search of 6 databases and Google Scholar search engine was performed for retrieving articles assessing reliability and/or validity of spinal curvature measurements obtained from clinical ultrasound. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of selected articles independently using criteria appraisal instrument. The results were analysed and synthesized qualitatively using level of evidence method. RESULTS: Fourteen articles were included. Thirteen articles investigated both the reliability and validity, of which nine were of high quality; and one article evaluated only the reliability and was of high quality. Totally five ultrasound methods were evaluated. Very high reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.80-1.00) but limited levels of evidence were found for the majority of the studied ultrasound methods. Almost all the methods showed good to excellent validity (correlation coefficient = 0.76-1.00) but limited to moderate levels of evidence. CONCLUSION: A high level of evidence was found in support of the reliability and validity of the COL (centre of lamina) ultrasound method. Further reliability and validity studies should be conducted to strengthen the level of evidence for those ultrasound methods with moderate, limited or conflicting level of evidence. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: Clinical ultrasound is radiation-free, low cost and user friendly, which makes it probable in assessment of scoliosis. Numerous studies have been conducted about the feasibility of using clinical ultrasound to assess scoliosis; thus, an inclusive review of the literature would be beneficial for researchers, clinicians and patients. This study aimed to systematically review the reliability and validity of coronal curvature assessments obtained from different clinical ultrasound imaging methods. METHODS: A comprehensive search of 6 databases and Google Scholar search engine was performed for retrieving articles assessing reliability and/or validity of spinal curvature measurements obtained from clinical ultrasound. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of selected articles independently using criteria appraisal instrument. The results were analysed and synthesized qualitatively using level of evidence method. RESULTS: Fourteen articles were included. Thirteen articles investigated both the reliability and validity, of which nine were of high quality; and one article evaluated only the reliability and was of high quality. Totally five ultrasound methods were evaluated. Very high reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.80-1.00) but limited levels of evidence were found for the majority of the studied ultrasound methods. Almost all the methods showed good to excellent validity (correlation coefficient = 0.76-1.00) but limited to moderate levels of evidence. CONCLUSION: A high level of evidence was found in support of the reliability and validity of the COL (centre of lamina) ultrasound method. Further reliability and validity studies should be conducted to strengthen the level of evidence for those ultrasound methods with moderate, limited or conflicting level of evidence. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Authors: Charles E Johnston; B Stephens Richards; Daniel J Sucato; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Mark Erickson Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-08-24 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Cécile M Ronckers; Charles E Land; Jeremy S Miller; Marilyn Stovall; John E Lonstein; Michele M Doody Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-07-21 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Rui Zheng; Doug Hill; Douglas Hedden; James Mahood; Marc Moreau; Sarah Southon; Edmond Lou Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 3.240