PURPOSE: The objectives of this preliminary study were to assess the reliability and accuracy of ultrasound (US) for measuring coronal curvature with and without the aid of a previous radiograph, and to evaluate the ability of US to detect curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. METHODS: Four raters measured 20 AIS US images twice at one-week intervals. Intra-rater reliability and correlation with radiograph were investigated with (rater 1) and without (raters 2-4) the aid of a previous radiograph. The center of lamina (COL) method was used to approximate the Cobb angle. RESULTS: Thirty-six curves were identified. All raters showed high intra-rater reliability (ICC[2,1] >0.80). With the aid of a previous radiograph, rater 1 showed higher correlation with radiograph (ICC[2,1] = 0.86), better standard error of measurement (SEM = 2.2°), and improved error index of selecting end-vertebrae (EI = 1.34), but no statistical improvement of intra-rater reliability (p > 0.05). For rater 2-4, the range of the ICC[2,1] values between US and radiograph measurements, the SEM value, and the range of the EI values were 0.70°-0.72°, 3.3°, and 1.65°-2.36°, respectively. Specificity and sensitivity of US for detecting curve progression were 0.91 and 0.83, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using a previous radiograph as a measurement aid helped the user to measure coronal curvature from US images, and improved the accuracy of end-vertebrae selection. US showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting curve progression, indicating that US may be a suitable, radiation-free alternative for monitoring patients with AIS who have mild or moderate curves.
PURPOSE: The objectives of this preliminary study were to assess the reliability and accuracy of ultrasound (US) for measuring coronal curvature with and without the aid of a previous radiograph, and to evaluate the ability of US to detect curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. METHODS: Four raters measured 20 AIS US images twice at one-week intervals. Intra-rater reliability and correlation with radiograph were investigated with (rater 1) and without (raters 2-4) the aid of a previous radiograph. The center of lamina (COL) method was used to approximate the Cobb angle. RESULTS: Thirty-six curves were identified. All raters showed high intra-rater reliability (ICC[2,1] >0.80). With the aid of a previous radiograph, rater 1 showed higher correlation with radiograph (ICC[2,1] = 0.86), better standard error of measurement (SEM = 2.2°), and improved error index of selecting end-vertebrae (EI = 1.34), but no statistical improvement of intra-rater reliability (p > 0.05). For rater 2-4, the range of the ICC[2,1] values between US and radiograph measurements, the SEM value, and the range of the EI values were 0.70°-0.72°, 3.3°, and 1.65°-2.36°, respectively. Specificity and sensitivity of US for detecting curve progression were 0.91 and 0.83, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using a previous radiograph as a measurement aid helped the user to measure coronal curvature from US images, and improved the accuracy of end-vertebrae selection. US showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting curve progression, indicating that US may be a suitable, radiation-free alternative for monitoring patients with AIS who have mild or moderate curves.
Authors: James O Sanders; Richard H Browne; Sharon J McConnell; Susan A Margraf; Timothy E Cooney; David N Finegold Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Timothy R Kuklo; Benjamin K Potter; Teresa M Schroeder; Michael F O'Brien Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-05-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Michaela Gstoettner; Katrin Sekyra; Nadja Walochnik; Peter Winter; Roland Wachter; Christian M Bach Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2007-06-05 Impact factor: 3.134