Literature DB >> 16162670

Biological effects in unirradiated human tissue induced by radiation damage up to 1 mm away.

Oleg V Belyakov1, Stephen A Mitchell, Deep Parikh, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Stephen A Marino, Sally A Amundson, Charles R Geard, David J Brenner.   

Abstract

A central tenet in understanding the biological effects of ionizing radiation has been that the initially affected cells were directly damaged by the radiation. By contrast, evidence has emerged concerning "bystander" responses involving damage to nearby cells that were not themselves directly traversed by the radiation. These long-range effects are of interest both mechanistically and for assessing risks from low-dose exposures, where only a small proportion of cells are directly hit. Bystander effects have been observed largely by using single-cell in vitro systems that do not have realistic multicellular morphology; no studies have as yet been reported in three-dimensional, normal human tissue. Given that the bystander phenomenon must involve cell-to-cell interactions, the relevance of such single-cell in vitro studies is questionable, and thus the significance of bystander responses for human health has remained unclear. Here, we describe bystander responses in a three-dimensional, normal human-tissue system. Endpoints were induction of micronucleated and apoptotic cells. A charged-particle microbeam was used, allowing irradiation of cells in defined locations in the tissue yet guaranteeing that no cells located more than a few micrometers away receive any radiation exposure. Unirradiated cells up to 1 mm distant from irradiated cells showed a significant enhancement in effect over background, with an average increase in effect of 1.7-fold for micronuclei and 2.8-fold for apoptosis. The surprisingly long range of bystander signals in human tissue suggests that bystander responses may be important in extrapolating radiation risk estimates from epidemiologically accessible doses down to very low doses where nonhit bystander cells will predominate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16162670      PMCID: PMC1202386          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505020102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-induced bystander effects. Mechanisms, biological implications, and current investigations at the Leipzig LIPSION facility.

Authors:  Jan Osterreicher; Kevin M Prise; Barry D Michael; Jürgen Vogt; Tilman Butz; Judith M Tanner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Bystander-induced apoptosis and premature differentiation in primary urothelial explants after charged particle microbeam irradiation.

Authors:  O V Belyakov; M Folkard; C Mothersill; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Long-range signal transmission in autocrine relays.

Authors:  Michal Pribyl; Cyrill B Muratov; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; J B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Biological responses in known bystander cells relative to known microbeam-irradiated cells.

Authors:  Brian Ponnaiya; Gloria Jenkins-Baker; David J Brenner; Eric J Hall; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Charles R Geard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Restricted-range gradients and travelling fronts in a model of juxtacrine cell relay.

Authors:  N A Monk
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 7.  Morphological and biochemical characterization and analysis of apoptosis.

Authors:  R T Allen; W J Hunter; D K Agrawal
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.950

8.  Comparison of an in vitro skin model to normal human skin for dermatological research.

Authors:  N A Monteiro-Riviere; A O Inman; T H Snider; J A Blank; D W Hobson
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Reconstructed skin kits: reproducibility of cutaneous irritancy testing.

Authors:  C Faller; M Bracher
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol       Date:  2002

10.  Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  80 in total

1.  Radiation Induced Bystander Effect in vivo.

Authors:  Yunfei Chai; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Acta Med Nagasaki       Date:  2008

2.  microRNAome changes in bystander three-dimensional human tissue models suggest priming of apoptotic pathways.

Authors:  Olga Kovalchuk; Franz J Zemp; Jody N Filkowski; Alvin M Altamirano; Jennifer S Dickey; Gloria Jenkins-Baker; Stephen A Marino; David J Brenner; William M Bonner; Olga A Sedelnikova
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  The balance between initiation and promotion in radiation-induced murine carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; Robert L Ullrich; Rainer K Sachs; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Exosome-mediated microRNA transfer plays a role in radiation-induced bystander effect.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Jufang Wang; Nan Ding; Wentao Hu; Xurui Zhang; Bing Wang; Junrui Hua; Wenjun Wei; Qiyun Zhu
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Effects of ionizing radiation in nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  William F Morgan; Marianne B Sowa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  50 Years of the Radiological Research Accelerator Facility (RARAF).

Authors:  Stephen A Marino
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  LNT: a never-ending story.

Authors:  Anna A Friedl; Werner Rühm
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 8.  Oxidative DNA damage caused by inflammation may link to stress-induced non-targeted effects.

Authors:  Carl N Sprung; Alesia Ivashkevich; Helen B Forrester; Christophe E Redon; Alexandros Georgakilas; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  MiR-663 inhibits radiation-induced bystander effects by targeting TGFB1 in a feedback mode.

Authors:  Wentao Hu; Shuai Xu; Bin Yao; Mei Hong; Xin Wu; Hailong Pei; Lei Chang; Nan Ding; Xiaofei Gao; Caiyong Ye; Jufang Wang; Tom K Hei; Guangming Zhou
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.652

10.  MiR-21 is involved in radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Nan Ding; Hailong Pei; Wentao Hu; Wenjun Wei; Xurui Zhang; Guangming Zhou; Jufang Wang
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.