Literature DB >> 10072746

The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program.

B C Tilley1, S W Vernon, R Myers, K Glanz, M Lu, K Hirst, A R Kristal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Next Step Trial was a randomized trial of worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion and nutrition interventions for automobile industry employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Interventions were tested at 28 worksites with 5,042 employees. This report describes results of the screening promotion intervention.
METHODS: Worksites randomized to the control group received a standard program including rectal examination, fecal occult blood testing, and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Intervention worksites received an enhanced program (i.e., standard program plus an educational booklet/telephone call). Compliance (i.e., completion of all recommended screening examinations) and coverage (i.e., completion of at least one screening examination), the primary and secondary outcomes, were measured over 2 years.
RESULTS: In the 2 years prior to baseline, 61% of employees had been screened. After random assignment, baseline differences in several employee characteristics and worksite screening procedures were detected, including more past history of screening in control worksites. After adjusting for differences, we found modest, but higher, compliance and coverage in intervention compared with control worksites (odds ratio [95% confidence limits] = 1.46 [1.1-2.0] and 1.33 [1.1, 1.6], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Adding a personally tailored behavioral intervention to a standard colorectal cancer screening program can promote continued employee participation in screening as measured by compliance. Further research is needed to assess intervention effects in other populations. Copyright 1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10072746     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  23 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a worksite intervention to reduce an occupational exposure: the Minnesota wood dust study.

Authors:  DeAnn Lazovich; David L Parker; Lisa M Brosseau; F Thomas Milton; Siobhan K Dugan; Wei Pan; Lynette Hock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices.

Authors:  Sherri P Varnell; David M Murray; Jessica B Janega; Jonathan L Blitstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Allison Burness; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Distinguishing factors for asymptomatic colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Patricia Zybert
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Alfred Neugut; Lawrence T DeCarlo; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Estimating development cost for a tailored interactive computer program to enhance colorectal cancer screening compliance.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Yu-Chia Chang; Judith L Bettencourt; Sally W Vernon; Anthony Greisinger
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Rhonda Belue; Stéphanie Wahab; Kathryn Rugen; Anita Y Kinney; Peter Maramaldi; Debra Wujcik; Laura A Szalacha
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

8.  Analysis of transtheoretical model of health behavioral changes in a nutrition intervention study--a continuous time Markov chain model with Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Junsheng Ma; Wenyaw Chan; Chu-Lin Tsai; Momiao Xiong; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Sally W Vernon; Nicole M Haddock; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Fecal occult blood testing: people in Ontario are unaware of it and not ready for it.

Authors:  Paul Ritvo; Ronald Myers; M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Lawrence Pazsat; Michelle Cotterchio; Roberta Howlett; Verna Mai; Patrick Brown; Terrence Sullivan; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.