Literature DB >> 22274725

Using the interdependence model to understand spousal influence on colorectal cancer screening intentions: a structural equation model.

Sharon Manne1, Deborah Kashy, David S Weinberg, Joseph A Boscarino, Deborah J Bowen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although it is widely thought that the marital relationship plays a role in individuals' decisions to have colorectal cancer screening, few studies have evaluated partner influences.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the role of marital relationship factors such as a relational perspective on the frequency of spouse discussions about screening and screening intentions. Individual-level factors were also evaluated.
METHODS: One hundred sixty-eight couples with both members non-adherent with screening completed measures of perceived risk, screening benefits and barriers, marital quality, relational perspective, discussion frequency, and screening intentions.
RESULTS: Couples' attitudes about screening were interdependent and one partner's attitudes and behavior were associated with the other partner's intention. There was also evidence of joint effects in that intentions were associated with both one's partner's attitudes and one's own attitudes.
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal screening intentions are associated with both partners' attitudes as well as whether or not couples have discussed screening with one another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22274725      PMCID: PMC3899794          DOI: 10.1007/s12160-012-9344-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  15 in total

1.  The health capital of families: an investigation of the inter-spousal correlation in health status.

Authors:  Sven E Wilson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: factors associated with screening behavior.

Authors:  Lisa Madlensky; Mary Jane Esplen; Steven Gallinger; John R McLaughlin; Vivek Goel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Antecedents and reactions to health-related social control.

Authors:  Megan A Lewis; Rita M Butterfield
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-03

4.  Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption.

Authors:  W Rakowski; B Ehrich; C E Dubé; D N Pearlman; M G Goldstein; K K Peterson; B K Rimer; H Woolverton
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-06

5.  Social control in personal relationships: impact on health behaviors and psychological distress.

Authors:  M A Lewis; K S Rook
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Husband-wife correspondence in smoking, drinking, and dietary habits.

Authors:  L N Kolonel; J Lee
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Using a family systems approach to investigate cancer risk communication within melanoma families.

Authors:  Julie N Harris; Jennifer Hay; Alan Kuniyuki; Maryam M Asgari; Nancy Press; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Examining the role of perceived susceptibility on colorectal cancer screening intention and behavior.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Sally W Vernon; Alexander J Rothman; Gregory J Norman; Ronald E Myers; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2010-10

9.  Spousal concordance in health behavior change.

Authors:  Tracy A Falba; Jody L Sindelar
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tess A Gregory; Carlene Wilson; Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Stephen R Cole; Graeme Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  15 in total

1.  Commentary on Manne et al.: Using the interdependence model to understand spousal influence on colorectal cancer screening intentions: a structural equation model.

Authors:  Mariët Hagedoorn
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2012-06

2.  Two-Part Predictors in Regression Models.

Authors:  John J Dziak; Kimberly L Henry
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Intentions to share exome sequencing results with family members: exploring spousal beliefs and attitudes.

Authors:  Erin Turbitt; Megan C Roberts; Rebecca A Ferrer; Jennifer M Taber; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker; William Mp Klein
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Distress and the parenting dynamic among BRCA1/2 tested mothers and their partners.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Tiffani A DeMarco; George Luta; Beth N Peshkin; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Correspondence of physical activity and fruit/vegetable consumption among prostate cancer survivors and their spouses.

Authors:  S Myers Virtue; S L Manne; D Kashy; C J Heckman; T Zaider; D W Kissane; I Kim; D Lee; G Olekson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  Understanding the role of family dynamics, perceived norms, and lung cancer worry in predicting second-hand smoke avoidance among high-risk lung cancer families.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Mark Wojda; Lauren Hamel; Alicia Salkowski; Ann G Schwartz; Felicity Wk Harper
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2016-03-07

7.  Coping with colorectal cancer: a qualitative exploration with patients and their family members.

Authors:  Gladys B Asiedu; Rosemary W Eustace; David T Eton; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Correspondence and correlates of couples' skin cancer screening.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Susan Darlow; Sharon L Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Teja Munshi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 10.282

9.  Differences between husbands and wives in colonoscopy use: Results from a national sample of married couples.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Diane S Lauderdale; Linda J Waite; William Dale
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  An omitted level: an examination of relational orientations and viral suppression among HIV serodiscordant male couples.

Authors:  Kristi E Gamarel; Torsten B Neilands; Sarit A Golub; Mallory O Johnson
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.