Literature DB >> 20655669

Zolpidem does not serve as reinforcer in humans subjected to simulated shift work.

Matthew G Kirkpatrick1, Margaret Haney, Suzanne K Vosburg, Sandra D Comer, Richard W Foltin, Carl L Hart.   

Abstract

Zolpidem attenuates shift-change-related sleep and performance disruptions. It is unknown whether these benefits alter the reinforcing effects of the drug during shift work. This study examined zolpidem-related reinforcing effects during simulated shift work. Eleven volunteers (3F, 8M) completed this 16-day within-participant, residential laboratory study. Each day participants were given an opportunity to self-administer oral zolpidem (10mg) or receive a $1 voucher immediately following a 9-h work period and immediately before going to bed. Participants worked under two shift conditions: (1) during the night shift, participants completed computerized task batteries from 00:30 to 09:30h and went to bed at 16:00h and (2) during the day shift, participants completed task batteries from 08:30 to 17:30h and went to bed at 24:00h. Shift conditions alternated three times during the study. Despite the fact that sleep, psychomotor performance, and some ratings of mood were disrupted during night-shift work, there was no significant effect of shift on choice to take zolpidem. Overall, participants selected markedly fewer zolpidem doses than monetary vouchers (17% versus 83%). Thus, zolpidem did not serve as a reinforcer even when sleep was disrupted. These data are consistent with previous reports indicating that sedatives produce limited reinforcing effects in individuals without a history of drug abuse.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20655669      PMCID: PMC5858901          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  22 in total

1.  Comparing performance on a simulated 12 hour shift rotation in young and older subjects.

Authors:  K Reid; D Dawson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Modulation of drug reinforcement by behavioral requirements following drug ingestion.

Authors:  K Silverman; K C Kirby; R R Griffiths
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of smoking on rapid information processing performance.

Authors:  K Wesnes; D M Warburton
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.328

4.  Effects of melatonin administration on daytime sleep after simulated night shift work.

Authors:  K M Sharkey; L F Fogg; C I Eastman
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.981

5.  Methamphetamine self-administration by humans.

Authors:  C L Hart; A S Ward; M Haney; R W Foltin; M W Fischman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Establishment of a diazepam preference in human volunteers following a differential-conditioning history of placebo versus diazepam choice.

Authors:  Sheila M Alessi; John M Roll; Mark P Reilly; Chris-Ellyn Johanson
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Zolpidem-related effects on performance and mood during simulated night-shift work.

Authors:  Carl L Hart; Amie S Ward; Margaret Haney; Richard W Foltin
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Performance-based testing for drugs of abuse: dose and time profiles of marijuana, amphetamine, alcohol, and diazepam.

Authors:  T H Kelly; R W Foltin; C S Emurian; M W Fischman
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Methamphetamine self-administration by humans subjected to abrupt shift and sleep schedule changes.

Authors:  Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Margaret Haney; Suzanne K Vosburg; Sandra D Comer; Richard W Foltin; Carl L Hart
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  A comparison of assessment techniques measuring the effects of methylphenidate, secobarbital, diazepam and diphenhydramine in abstinent alcoholics.

Authors:  T P Miller; J L Taylor; J R Tinklenberg
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.