Literature DB >> 12022801

Establishment of a diazepam preference in human volunteers following a differential-conditioning history of placebo versus diazepam choice.

Sheila M Alessi1, John M Roll, Mark P Reilly, Chris-Ellyn Johanson.   

Abstract

This study examined whether preference for a drug (diazepam or placebo) could be switched using conditioning procedures. During the first 4 sessions of Phase 1, 6 participants received 5 mg of diazepam or placebo under double-blind conditions. During the remaining 5 sessions of Phase 1, participants selected the drug they wished to receive. The first 4 sessions of Phase 2 were a replication of Phase 1, except that following ingestion of the drug, participants completed a computer task for which they could earn money. Payment for the computer task was lowest following ingestion of the drug they preferred in Phase I and highest following the drug they had avoided. Preference was reassessed during the last 5 sessions of Phase 2. Five of the participants preferred placebo in Phase 1 but diazepam in Phase 2. Subjective responses to the drugs also changed across the 2 phases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12022801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  14 in total

1.  Novelty, stimulus control, and operant variability.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Philip N Chase
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  Interoceptive conditioning in rats: effects of using a single training dose or a set of 5 different doses of nicotine.

Authors:  Steven T Pittenger; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Perhaps More Consideration of Pavlovian-Operant Interaction May Improve the Clinical Efficacy of Behaviorally Based Drug Treatment Programs.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2013

4.  Comparison of intranasal methamphetamine and d-amphetamine self-administration by humans.

Authors:  Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Erik W Gunderson; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Frances R Levin; Richard W Foltin; Carl L Hart
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Nicotine competes with a visual stimulus for control of conditioned responding.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Nicole R Wells; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 6.  Disentangling the nature of the nicotine stimulus.

Authors:  Rick A Bevins; Scott T Barrett; Robert J Polewan; Steven T Pittenger; Natashia Swalve; Sergios Charntikov
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Conditioned response evoked by nicotine conditioned stimulus preferentially induces c-Fos expression in medial regions of caudate-putamen.

Authors:  Sergios Charntikov; Matthew E Tracy; Changjiu Zhao; Ming Li; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Zolpidem does not serve as reinforcer in humans subjected to simulated shift work.

Authors:  Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Margaret Haney; Suzanne K Vosburg; Sandra D Comer; Richard W Foltin; Carl L Hart
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Cocaine self-administration in rats with histories of cocaine exposure and discrimination.

Authors:  E Childs; M Shoaib; I P Stolerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  The interoceptive Pavlovian stimulus effects of caffeine.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Chia Li; Matthew I Palmatier; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.