Literature DB >> 20655049

Validation of the Delft Shoulder and Elbow Model using in-vivo glenohumeral joint contact forces.

A A Nikooyan1, H E J Veeger, P Westerhoff, F Graichen, G Bergmann, F C T van der Helm.   

Abstract

The Delft Shoulder and Elbow Model (DSEM), a large-scale musculoskeletal model, is used for the estimation of muscle and joint reaction forces in the shoulder and elbow complex. Although the model has been qualitatively verified using EMG-signals, quantitative validation has until recently not been feasible. The development of an instrumented shoulder endoprosthesis has now made this possible. To this end, motion data, EMG-signals, external forces, and in-vivo glenohumeral joint reaction forces (GH-JRF) were recorded for two patients with an instrumented shoulder hemi-arthroplasty, during dynamic tasks (including abduction and anteflexion) and force tasks with the arm held in a static position. Motions and external forces served as the model inputs to estimate the GH-JRF. In the modeling process, the effect of two different (stress and energy) optimization cost functions and uniform size and mass scaling were evaluated. The model-estimated GH-JRF followed the in-vivo measured force for dynamic tasks up to about 90° arm elevations, but generally underestimates the peak forces up to 31%; whereas a different behavior (ascending measured but descending estimated force) was found for angles above 90°. For the force tasks the model generally overestimated the peak GH-JRF for most directions (on average up to 34%). Applying the energy cost function improved model predictions for the dynamic anteflexion task (up to 9%) and for the force task (on average up to 23%). Scaling also led to improvement of the model predictions during the dynamic tasks (up to 26%), but had a negligible effect (<2%) on the force task results. Although results indicated a reasonable compatibility between model and measured data, adjustments will be necessary to individualize the generic model with the patient-specific characteristics.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20655049     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of musculoskeletal modelling for the shoulder and upper limb.

Authors:  Bart Bolsterlee; Dirkjan H E J Veeger; Edward K Chadwick
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Modelling clavicular and scapular kinematics: from measurement to simulation.

Authors:  Bart Bolsterlee; H E J Veeger; F C T van der Helm
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Multi-patient finite element simulation of keeled versus pegged glenoid implant designs in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Werner Pomwenger; Karl Entacher; Herbert Resch; Peter Schuller-Götzburg
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Development of a comprehensive musculoskeletal model of the shoulder and elbow.

Authors:  A Asadi Nikooyan; H E J Veeger; E K J Chadwick; M Praagman; F C T van der Helm
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  In Vitro Simulation of Shoulder Motion Driven by Three-Dimensional Scapular and Humeral Kinematics.

Authors:  Hema J Sulkar; Tyler W Knighton; Linda Amoafo; Klevis Aliaj; Christopher W Kolz; Yue Zhang; Tucker Hermans; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Effects of densitometry, material mapping and load estimation uncertainties on the accuracy of patient-specific finite-element models of the scapula.

Authors:  Gianni Campoli; Bart Bolsterlee; Frans van der Helm; Harrie Weinans; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  A Novel Mass-Spring-Damper Model Analysis to Identify Landing Deficits in Athletes Returning to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel K Schneider; Alli Gokeler; Egbert Otten; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett; Jon G Divine; Angelo J Colosimo; Robert S Heidt; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Multi-Joint Compensatory Effects of Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty During High-Demand Tasks.

Authors:  Brecca M Gaffney; Michael D Harris; Bradley S Davidson; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Cory L Christiansen; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Modeling a rotator cuff tear: Individualized shoulder muscle forces influence glenohumeral joint contact force predictions.

Authors:  Meghan E Vidt; Anthony C Santago; Anthony P Marsh; Eric J Hegedus; Christopher J Tuohy; Gary G Poehling; Michael T Freehill; Michael E Miller; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.